期刊文献+

流式细胞术检测4种提取沙棘核DNA方法的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of different nuclear isolation buffers for species of Hippophae DNA flow cytometry
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用4种不同提取细胞核的方法,测定了6个不同沙棘品种的核DNA含量,比较了4种不同提取方法测得的CV值的差异.结果表明:4种提取沙棘核DNA的方法所测得的内标CV值为2.49%~11.31%,待测样CV值为2.53%~12.08%.当Tris.MgCl2法测定时,细胞核全部破碎,故未得到流式图;用Otto's法测得的CV值最小,内标与待测样CV值分别为2.49%~3.35%,2.53%~3.56%.因此,Otto's法为最适宜提取沙棘细胞核DNA的方法. The nuclear DNA content of six different species of Hippophae were detected using four nu- clear isolation buffers (Galbraith's,LB01, Otto's and Tris · MgCl2 ), comparing the difference of CV in the four buffers, so as to find the optimum method for lysing nuclear DNA in species of Hippophae, the stand- ard CV were measured ranging from 2. 49% to 11. 31~//00 and the samples CV varied from 2. 53% to 12. 08%. Histograms of relative fluorescence intensity were not obtained using Tris ~ MgC12 for a large number of debris emerging,but Otto's was the optimum buffer (the standard CV=2. 49-3.35%; the samples CV= 2.53%-3.56%) for preparing suspension of intact nuclei of Hippophae. The results might provide guidance for the future experiments of other plants with similar ploidy and cell component, and promote applieations of flow cytometry in plant research.
出处 《甘肃农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期155-160,共6页 Journal of Gansu Agricultural University
关键词 沙棘 流式细胞术 细胞核提取液 核DNA含量 Hippophae flow cytometry nuclear isolation buffer ; nuclear DNA content
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1张建华,何云海,陈铭荻,陈火英.温度对爆裂型玉米萌发和出苗的影响[J].上海农学院学报,1994,12(4):257-259. 被引量:21
  • 2曹林奎,唐洪妹,陆小毛.四棱豆种子萌发和出苗温度[J].上海农业学报,1996,12(3):60-63. 被引量:27
  • 3RUBEN MALLON, JUAN RODRIGUEZ-OUBINA, MARIA LUZ GONZALEZ. In vitro propagation of the endangered plant Centaurea ultreiae:assessment of genetic stability by cytological studies, flow cytometry and RAPD analysis [J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture,2010,101(1):31-39.
  • 4MIYASHITA T, ARAKI H, HOSHINO Y. Ploidy distribution and DNA content variations of Lonicera caemlea (Caprifoliaceae) in Japan [J]. Journal of Plant Research,2010,Online First.
  • 5JOAO LOUREIRO, PAVEL TRAVNICEK, JANA RAUCHOVA, et al. The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of hornoploid plants [J]. Preslia,2010,82:3-21.
  • 6EVA GROTKOPP, MARCEL REJMANEK, MICHAEL SANDERSON, et al. Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates [J]. Supertree Analyses Evolution,2004,58 (8): 1705-1729.
  • 7JEREMY M. BEAULIEU, ILIA J,LEITCH, SUNIL PATEL, et al. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms [J]. New Physiologist,2008,179(4):975-986.
  • 8MAGDALENA KUBESOVA, LENKA MORAVCOVAI, JAN SUDA, et al. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora [J]. Preslia,2010,82:81-96.
  • 9SCHMIDT-LEBUHN A N, FUCHS J, KESSLER M. Flow cytometric measurements do not reveal different ploidy levels in Minthostachys (Lamiaceae) [J]. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2008,271(1-2):123-128.
  • 10LEITCH A R, LEITCH I J. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants [J]. Science,2008,209(5875):481-483.

共引文献143

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部