期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

高速涡轮钻法和劈凿法拔除下颌阻生齿的临床效能 被引量：23

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究高速涡轮法拔除下颌中低位阻生齿的优越性,并初步探讨下颌阻生齿拔除后术后并发症和临床变量的关系。方法对170颗下颌阻生齿随机采用劈冠凿骨法(对照组)和高速涡轮钻法(观察组)去除阻力拔除。进行临床观察分析,并记录拔牙时间、疼痛程度、张口受限程度和干槽症情况。结果观察组拔牙时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者术后疼痛程度、张口受限程度构成比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),两组干槽症发病率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),观察组发病率明显低于对照组。所在患者拔牙术后并发症在不同年龄组别、不同拔牙法、不同拔牙时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论高速涡轮钻法拔牙时间短,术后并发症反应轻,干槽症发生率低(P<0.01)。下颌阻生齿拔出术术后并发症与年龄、阻生类型、拔牙方法和拔牙时间有关。
作者 许国雄 黄宇华 黄琦 陈建灵 王健
机构地区 广东省中医院口腔颌面外科
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第17期2609-2611,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
关键词 高速涡轮钻 下颌阻生齿 术后并发症 拔牙术
分类号 R782.11 [医药卫生—口腔医学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1丁玲,陆群.高速涡轮气钻法与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿的对比分析研究[J].口腔医学,2000,20(3):133-134. 被引量：49
  • 2徐光宙,俞创奇,杨驰.阻生下颌第三磨牙的治疗及并发症研究进展[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2010,20(4):289-292. 被引量：39
  • 3MERCIER P, PRECIOUS D. Risks and benefits of removal of im- pacted third molars: a critical review of the literature [ J ]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1992, 21 ( 1 ) : 17 -27.
  • 4BLONDEAU F, DANIEL N G. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors [J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2007, 73(4) : 325a-325e.
  • 5BOULOUX G F, STEED M B, PERCIACCANTE V J. Complica- tions of third molar surgery [ J ]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2007, 19(1): 117-128.
  • 6彭铁男,耿书辉,赵巍,刘超,孙宏晨.高速涡轮钻法与劈凿法拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的临床对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(4):530-531. 被引量：14
  • 7MALKAWI Z, AL OMIRI M K, KHRAISAT A. Risk indicators of postoperative complications following surgical extraction of lower third molars[J]. Med Princ Praet, 2011, 20(4) : 321 -325.
  • 8BELLO S A, ADEYEMO W L, BAMGBOSE B O, et al. Effect of age, impaction types and operative time on inflammatory tissue re- actions following lower third molar surgery [ J ]. Head Face Med, 2011, 287: 8.
  • 9FRIEDLAND B, DONOFF B, DODSON T B. The use of 3 - di- mensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 66(8) : 1678 -1685.

二级参考文献40

  • 1周建国,步中琦,朱亚芳.下颌第三磨牙阻生两种拔除术的并发症比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):250-252. 被引量：16
  • 2耿温琦.高速涡轮钻在拔下颌阻生智齿时的应用[J].中华口腔科杂志,1983,18(4):214-214.
  • 3邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.305.
  • 4Kilpatrick H C. Removal of impacted third molar utilizing speed up to 200000 [J]r. p. m. Oral Surg,1958;11: 364.
  • 5Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, et al. Plateletrich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral combined with guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2002, 37(4):300-306.
  • 6Sammartino G, Tia M, Marenzi G, et al. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma(PRP) in periodontal defect treatment after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 2005,63(6):766-770.
  • 7Subhashraj K. A study on the impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures[J]. J Oral Maxillfac Surg, 2009, 67(5):968-972.
  • 8Inaoka SD, Carneiro SC, Vasconcelos BC, et al. Reationship between mandibular fracture and impacted lower third molar[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2009, 14(7):E349- E354.
  • 9Monaco G, Daprile G, Tavernese L, et al. Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg ,2009,67( 1 ):15-21.
  • 10Moss CE, Wake MJ. Lingual access for third surgery: a 20- year retrospective audit[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999, 37(4):255-258.

共引文献96

同被引文献105

  • 1王健华,付玉平.高速涡轮机微创拔牙法与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除治疗复杂阻生牙的临床效果及安全性比较[J].反射疗法与康复医学,2024,5(2):104-107. 被引量：7
  • 2路春宇.用高速涡轮钻去骨法与锤凿去骨法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床疗效比较[J].求医问药（下半月）,2013(1):81-81. 被引量：2
  • 3郭锦清.高速涡轮钻去阻力拔除下颌阻生智齿的研究[J].贵州医药,2011,35(1):19-20. 被引量：7
  • 4CARDOSO C L, RODRIGUES M T, FERREIRA JUNIOR O, et al. Clinical concepts of dry socket [ J ]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(8) : 1922 -1932.
  • 5BLUM I R. Contemporary views on dry socket ( alveolar osteitis) : a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and man- agement: a critical review[ J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 31(3) : 309 -317.
  • 6MENG W, DONG Y, LIU J, et al. A clinical evaluation of amlex- anox oral adhesive pellieles in the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis and comparison with amlexanox oral tablets: a random- ized, placebo controlled, blinded, muhieenter clinical trial [ J ]. Trials, 2009, 10: 30.
  • 7DALY B, SHARIF M O, NEWTON T, et al. Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis ( dry socket). Cochrane Da- tabase Syst Rev, 2012, 12: CD006968.
  • 8GOLDSMITH SM, DE SILVA RK, TONG DC, et al. Influence of a pedicle flap design on acute postoperative sequelae after lower third molar removal[ J. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41 (3) : 371 -375.
  • 9POOR M R, HALL J E, POOR A S. Reduction in the incidence of alveolar osteitis in patients treated with the SaliCept Patch, con- taining Acemannan Hydrogel [ J ]. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg, 2002, 60(4) : 374 -379.
  • 10HAGHIGHAT A, BAHRI NAJAFI R, BAZVAND M, et al. The effectiveness of GECB pastille in reducing complications of dry socket syndrome[J]. Int J Dent, 2012, 2012: 587461.

引证文献23

二级引证文献91

广东医学
2012年 第17期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部