期刊文献+

飞秒激光INTRACOR技术矫正老视 被引量:11

Evaluation of femtosecond laser based on the INTRACORE technique for treating presbyopia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价飞秒激光INTRACOR技术治疗老视的安全性、有效性和可预测性。方法回顾性病例研究。老视患者28例(28眼),选取非主导眼采用TPV520F飞秒激光系统INTRACOR技术进行老视矫正,检测手术前后的裸眼远、近视力,屈光度,眼压,角膜内皮计数,角膜地形图,对比敏感度,眩光敏感度及患者术后主观感受。术后随访6个月。采用配对t检验或配对Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果所有手术均顺利,术后6个月裸眼远视力中位数为0.0(0.2~-0.1)[术前为0.0(0.2~-0.1)]logMAR,两者差异无统计学意义;术后6个月裸眼近视力中位数为0.25(0.4-0.0)[术前为0.5(1.0-0.3)]logMAR,较术前平均提高(6.25±1.74)行,差异有统计学意义(t=18.66,P〈0.01)。术后6个月球镜度中位数为-0.25(-0.75-0.25)D,柱镜度中位数为0.0(-0.75—0.25)D,等效球镜中位数为-0.37(-0.75~0.25)D,术前分别为+0.5(-0.25~1.0)D、0.0(-0.5.0.0)D、+0.25(-0.12—0.75)D,手术前后球镜和等效球镜度差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.50、-4.57,P〈0.01).柱镜度差异无统计学意义。术眼屈光度轻度近视漂移。眼内压、角膜内皮计数及对比敏感度眩光敏感度手术前后比较差异均无统计学意义,术后6个月采用生活质量调查表进行量化评价得分为89±14,满意度高。结论INTRACOR飞秒技术治疗老视术后能显著提高患者近视力,对远视无明显影响,有较好的安全性和有效性。 Objective To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and stability of the INTRACOR femtosecond laser-based intrastromalproeedure to treat presbyopia. Methods In a retrospective case-series study, the nondominant eye (28 eyes in 28 presbyopic cases) was treated with femtosecond laser based on the INTRACORE technique and comparisons were made before and after the operation for near and distance visual acuity, refractive error, intraoeular pressure, endothelial cell density, corneal topography, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and patient satisfaction. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Data were analyzed using paired t test or paired Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results All cases were uneventful. Mean distance visual acuity (VA) at 6 months postoperatively was 0.0 logMAR (range, 0.2 to -0.1) compared to a preoperative VA of 0.0 logMAR (range, 0.2 to -0.1). The difference was not significant. Mean near visual acuity at 6 months postoperatively was 0.25 logMAR (range, 0.4 to 0.0) compared to 0.5 logMAR (range, 1.0 to 0.3) preoperatively. The elevated postoperative value (6.25±1.74 lines) was significantly different than the preoperative value (t=18.66, P〈0.01). The mean values for spherical power, cylinder equivalent and spherical equivalent at 6 months postoperatively were -0.25 D (range, -0.75 to 0.25 D), 0.0 D (range, -0.75 to 0.25 D) and -0.37 D (range, -0.75 to 0.25 D), respectively, compared to preoperative values of 0.5 D (range, -0.25 to 1.0 D), 0.0 D (range, -0.5 to 0.0 D) and +0.25 D (range, -0.12 to 0.75 D), respectively. The differences before and after the operation were significant for both spherical power and spherical equivalent values (Z=-4.50, -4.57, both P〈0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the cylinder equivalent value before and after the operation. The INTRACORE treatment induced a slight myopic shift of -0.54 D and there were no significant differences for intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity before and after the operation. The average score was 89±14 for the quality of life questionnaire at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion Femtosecond laser-based treatment using the INTRACORE technique appears to improve near visual acuity in presbyopic patients but there was no apparent effect on distance visual acuity. Femtosecond laser-based treatment with the INTRACORE technique is safe and has good visual outcomes.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2012年第9期521-525,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 基金项目:山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(保健项目)面上资助项目(2011BJYB15)
关键词 飞秒激光 老视 角膜基质 Femtosecond laser Presbyopia Corneal stroma
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1杜鹏,翟振武,陈卫.中国人口老龄化百年发展趋势[J].人口研究,2005,29(6):90-93. 被引量:296
  • 2Medeiros FW, Stapleton WM, Hammel J, et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg,2007,23: 880-887.
  • 3Pepose J, Lubatschowski H. Comparing femtosecond lasers. J Cataract Refract Surg Today,2008,10:45-52.
  • 4Ruiz LA, Cepeda LM, Fuentes VC. Intrastromal correction of presbyopia with a femtosecond laser system. J Refract Surg, 2009,25 : 847-854.
  • 5Holzer MP, Mannsfeld A, Ehmer A, et al. Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtoseeond laser treatment for presbyopia. J Refract Surg,2009,25:855-861.
  • 6Ogle KN. On the problem of an international nomenclature for designating visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol,1953,36:909- 921.
  • 7Holzer MP, Knorz MC, Tomalla M, et al. Intrastromal femtosecond laser presbyopia correction: 1-year results of a multicenter study. J Refract Surg,2012,28:182-188.

二级参考文献2

共引文献295

同被引文献170

  • 1张文亮,王淑美.五子衍宗丸合二至丸治疗老视48例[J].中国药业,2006,15(15):63-63. 被引量:5
  • 2毕宏生,季鹏,王兴荣,马晓华,王宝晶,王桂敏,王桂英.虹膜识别技术在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视性散光中的临床研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2007,43(4):324-328. 被引量:7
  • 3Rosa AM,Neto-Murta J,Quadrado MJ,Tavares C,Lobo C,VanVelze R,et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkera-tomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effectof postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosec-ond flap thickness [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2009,35 (5):833-838.
  • 4Pitkanen A, Pietila J, Makinen P, Huhtala A, Uusitalo H. Com-parison of laser in situ keratomileusis reoperation outcomeswith the Moria M2 head 90 and 130 following previous photore-fractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis [ J ] ? ActaOphthalmol,2010(3) :352-357.
  • 5Shin J, Kim TW, Park SJ, Yoon M, Lee JW. Changes in biome-chanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure aftermyopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laserfor flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer andgoldmann applanation tonometry [ J ]. J Glaucoma ,2013,[ Epubahead of print].
  • 6Spadea L,Cantera E, Cortes M,Conocchia NE, Stewart CW. Cor-neal ectasia after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis : a long-term study [J]. Clin Ophthalmol ,2012,6( 10) :1801-1813.
  • 7Prakash G,Agarwal A,Kumar DA,Chari M,Agarwal A,Jacob S,et al. Femtosecond sub-bowman keratomileusis : a prospective,long-term,intereye comparison of safety and outcomes of 90-vereus 100-jijn flaps[ J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2011,152 (4) :582-590.
  • 8Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL’Arba Mosquera S, Moreno U. Cornealhi^er order aberrations after LASIK for high myopia with a fastrepetition rate excimer laser, optimized ablation profile, andfemtosecond laser-assisted flap [ J ]. J Refract Surg,2012, 28(10) :689-696.
  • 9Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, ^ortdal J. Femtosecond(FS)laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia:aprospective study of ReLEx( ? ) flex and comparison with a ret-rospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis [ J ] ? ActaOphmalmol,2013,91(4) :355-362.
  • 10Issa A, Al Hassany U. Femtosecond laser flap parameters andvisual outcomes in laser in situ keratomileusis[ J]. J CataractRefract Surg,2011,37(4) :665-674.

引证文献11

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部