摘要
自2001年最高人民法院《民事诉讼证据规定》出台以来,其创立的证据失权制度就倍受质疑,直接导致人们对该制度是否具有正义性产生怀疑。一般认为,诉讼中的失权是为加速诉讼进行而设立的制度,旨在提高效率;由于失权可能产生损害实体公正的严重后果,那么该制度的设立是否还具有正当性呢?诉讼中的失权制度,能够实现当事人适时裁判请求权,保障当事人诉讼平等,维护诉讼的顺畅与程序的安定,其设立具有正当性依据。
Since the Regulations on Civil Procedural Evidence issued by the Supreme People＇s Court was enacted in 2001, the evidence disqualification rule has been questioned, which leads to people＇s query about its justifiability. It is generally held that the evidence disqualification rule in civil litigation is a sys- tern aimed to speed up the operation of civil procedure and promote the efficiency. In the light of the seri- ous damage to the substantial justice caused by the evidence disqualification rule, we should ask whether this rule has any justifiability or not？ This article focuses on the justifiable basis of evidence disqualification rule in view of its realization for timely request for right trial, protection of equality of litigants, and main- tenance of smooth progress of litigation and stability of procedure.
出处
《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2012年第4期90-96,共7页
Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
关键词
民事诉讼
失权制度
正当性根据
civil litigation
evidence disqualification rule
basis of justifiability
