学科团队特征、运作过程影响教学绩效的路径及机制——基于安徽科技学院应用型创新创业人才培养的实证研究被引量：1

On Path and Mechanism of the Academic Team Characteristics & Operating Process Affecting Teaching Performance——An empirical study based on the practice for turning out applied innovative and job-creating talents in Anhui Science and Technology University

下载PDF

导出

摘要应用型创新创业人才培养对高校教学工作提出了新的更高的要求,在对相关研究进行疏理的基础上,以安徽科技学院应用型创新创业学科教学为例,构建SEM模型,分析学科团队特征、运作过程及教学绩效间的路径及机制,修订后的SEM模型表明:改革培养模式前学科团队、学科教学及科学研究对改善教学绩效作用不明显,团队特征不对教学绩效产生直接影响,且总效应为负,为应用型本科院校学科团队建设提供了启示. Applied innovative and job-creating talents training is now posing new and stricter demands on teaching in colleges and universities. After sorting and combing through the already-done researches, the subject teaching of training applied innovative job-creating talents in Anhui Science and Technology University is taken as a case study to establish a structural e quation model （SEM）, in an effort to analyze the path and mechanism between the academic team characteristics, the operating process and teaching performance. The modified SEM reveals that academic team, subject teaching and scientific research exert inapparent influence on teaching performance before the training mode is reformed; the team characteristics poses no direct im pact on teaching performance with the gross effect being negative, which might provide some inspiration for the construction of academic team for colleges and universities aiming to turning out applied talents.

作者胡春阳刘朝臣金怀玉

机构地区安徽科技学院财经学院安徽科技学院管理学院

出处《内江师范学院学报》 2012年第8期84-89,共6页 Journal of Neijiang Normal University

基金安徽省质量工程项目<工商管理应用型本科专业教学团队>(20100807) 安徽省重点教研项目<多元介入应用型创新创业人才培养模式研究>(20100810)

关键词学科团队运作过程教学绩效结构方程模型 academic team operating process teaching performance structural equation model

分类号 G64 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Shane S, Stuart T. Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Startups [J]. Management Science, 2002,48(1):154-170.
2Chowdhury S. Demographic Diversity for Building an Effective Entrepreneurial Team: Is It Important? [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005,20(6) :727-746.
3Julian C C. Wachter R M, Mueller C B. International Joint Venture Top Management Teams: Does Heterogeneity Make a Difference? [J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 2009,10(2) : 107-129.
4Hambriek D C. Top Management Groups: A Conceptual Integration and Reconsideration of the"Team"Label. In B. M. S. L. L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1994, Vol. 16: 171-213. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5姚振华,孙海法.高管团队组成特征、沟通频率与组织绩效的关系[J].软科学,2011,25(6):64-68. 被引量：26
6戴勇,范明.高校基础研究团队有效性及影响因素分析科[J].技进步与对策,2010(13):134-136.
7Finkelstein S, Hambrick D C. Top-management-team Tenure and Organization Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Management Discretion [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(3) :484-503.
8王军.基于团队管理组织特征的人力资源管理策略研究[J].深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2011,28(5):105-108. 被引量：11
9张燕,章振.性别多样性对团队绩效和创造力影响的研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(3):81-88. 被引量：27
10Foo M D, Sin H P, Yiong L P. Effects of team inputs and intrateamprocesses on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures [J]. Strategic Management Journal , 2006,27 (4) : 389-399.