期刊文献+

巴黎气候大会后的中美气候合作 被引量:5

Sino-U.S. Climate Cooperation in the Post-Paris Agreements Era
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为中美关系中的一个领域,气候合作经历了从无到有,从次要到主要,从边缘到核心的转变过程。中美作为当今世界温室气体的主要排放国和最主要经济体,双方自2009年以来在该领域的合作与交流无疑对2015年年底巴黎气候大会的成功召开和《巴黎协定》的顺利签订作出了积极贡献。尽管仍存在诸多分歧、面临诸多挑战,但巴黎气候大会在全球气候治理中具有承上启下的意义,也对未来全球气候治理制度做出了重要安排。因此,在《巴黎协定》签订之后,中美双方的合作将会在两个方面得以持续:一是重点推动前期合作成果的落实,二是在新协定框架下推动地方层面、技术层面以及更具体领域的气候合作。可以认为,中美气候合作将是推动全球气候治理进程的关键动力。对中国而言,中美气候领域的沟通合作和分歧管控对维护双边关系的整体稳定也具有重要作用,对中国参与全球治理也有积极的借鉴意义。 Climate cooperation has changed from a peripheral topic to a catchphrase in the Sino-U.S. relationship. As the world's two largest economies and greenhouse gas emitters, cooperation and exchanges between China and the United States since 2009 have played a positive role in facilitating the 2015 Paris climate conference and the subsequent Paris climate deal. Despite significant disagreements and unaddressed challenges, the Paris conference is a pivotal international event for global climate governance and the Paris accord is an important institutional arrangement for future global climate governance. Post-Paris cooperation between China and the United States could be sustained and enhanced in two ways: promoting the full implementation of their earlier consensus and advancing climate cooperation at the local and technical level and in more specific areas under the Paris framework. Sino-American climate cooperation is the primary driver of the global climate governance process. For China, full and honest communication and cooperation and effective dispute management regarding climate issues between the United States and China will not only positively contribute to a stable bilateral relationship but also help China learn from best practices for its deeper participation in global governance.
作者 刘元玲
出处 《国际展望》 CSSCI 2016年第2期40-58,共19页 Global Review
关键词 巴黎协定 气候治理 全球治理 中美新型大国关系 Paris Agreement Climate governance global governance Sino-US new model of major-country relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献86

  • 1See Nigel Purvis and Andrew Stevenson, "Rethin- king Climate Diplomacy : New Ideas for Transatlantic Cooperation Post-Copenhagen," Brussels Forum Paper Series, The German Marshall Fund of The United States, 2010.
  • 2Conference Report, " Resolving Deadlock in Climate Change Negotiations," EU-Asia Dialogue, Bonn, Germany, April 25 - 26, 2013.
  • 3Glen Sussman and Byron W. Daynes, "An Early Assessment of President George W. Bush and the Environment," in Bryan Hilliard, Tom Lansford, and Robert P. Watson, George W. Bush: Evaluating the President at Midterm ( New York : State University of New York Press, 2004 ), p. 59.
  • 4Glen Sussman, "The USA and Global Environmental Policy : Domestic Constraints on Effective Leadership," Inter- national Political Science Review, Vol. 25 ( October 2004) , pp. 349, 365.
  • 5Andrew C. Revkin, "Issuing a Bold Challenge to the U.S. over Climate," New York Times, January 22, 2008.
  • 6Matt Hoye and Holly Yan, "U. S. and China Reach Historic Climate Change Deal, Vow to Cut Emissions," CNN, November 12, 2014, available at : http ://edition. cnn. com/2014/11/12/world/us-china-climate-change-agree- ment/.
  • 7Joshua P. Meltzer, "U. S. -China Joint Presidential Statement on Climate Change: The Road to Paris and Beyond," Brookings Blogs, September 25, 2015, available at : http ://www. brookings, edu/blogs/planetpoliey/posts/2015/ 09/29 - us-china-statement -climate -change -meltzer.
  • 8Yanek Mieczkowski, Gerald Ford and the Challenges of the 1970s ( Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2005 ) , pp. 102 - 103.
  • 9Richard Nathan, "Updating Theories of Federalism," in Timothy J. Conlan and Paul L. Posner eds. , Intergovern- mental Management in the 21st Century (Washington, D. C. : Brookings Institution, 2008 ), pp. 13 25.
  • 10Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U. S. 497, 2007.

共引文献32

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部