期刊文献+

变革时代政法人的司法使命——沃伦与王胜俊能动司法哲学观比较 被引量:2

Judicial Mission of Legal Person in the Times of Changing
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从社会现实出发,寻找正确的司法哲学指导司法活动,积极回应时代的司法需求,是政法人的时代司法使命。作为中美司法能动的主要倡导者,沃伦和王胜俊都主张司法应积极回应政治和变革时代的民众权利需求,高度关注弱势群体的权利保障,关注社会实质正义,注重司法结果衡平。但由于生活的政治、意识形态、文化和社会历史背景等巨大差异,二人对于能动司法的理解当然也不完全相同。 From social reality, to find the right judicial philosophy guiding the judicial activities of the positive response to the judicial needs of the times, is the political and legal mission of the era of justice. As a leading proponent of Sino-US judicial activism, Warren and Wang Shengjun advocate that justice should actively respond to the needs of the public rights in the times of political changes , highly concerned about the protection of the rights of vul- nerable groups, concerned about the substance of social justice, focusing on equitable judicial results. However, due to great differences of political, ideological, cultural and social historical background of life, they dan' t understand the dynamic of justice exactly the same. When we stressed the dynamic administration of justice, China should focus on combining the law of development of judicial career at the same time.
作者 杨建军
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2012年第4期22-28,共7页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 2010年度国家社科基金项目"司法能动与中国司法发展道路的探索"(10BFX050)的阶段性成果
关键词 政法 能动司法 使命 衡平 法律职业化 politics and law active judicial mission equity legal professional
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[美]施瓦茨.美国最高法院史[M].毕洪海等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 2[美]鲍威.沃伦法院与美国政治[M].欧数军译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 3[美]霍维茨.沃伦法院对正义的追求[M].信春鹰、张志铭译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 4记者.王胜俊:满足公众新期待是首席大法官的重要任务[N].法制网,2011-6-13,http://www.1egaldaily.corn.cn/index-article/con-tent/2011-06/13/content_2743460.htm?node=5955.
  • 5张亮.王胜俊在江苏法院调研并与代表委员座谈时强调:能动司法是法院的必然选择[N].法制日报2009-9-1.
  • 6记者:王胜俊强调:人民法院工作与"三项重点工作"的十个结合点[N].人民法院报,2010-4-25.
  • 7Kermit Roosevelt III: ,The myth of judicial activism[ M ], Yale University , New Haven and London press ,2006.
  • 8贺小荣.王胜俊强调:能动司法是人民法院服务经济社会发展大局的必然选择[M].人民法院报,2009-9-1.
  • 9赵杰.美国厄尔·沃伦法院的历史贡献[J].南都学坛(南阳师专学报),1998,18(1):23-26. 被引量:2
  • 10白雪峰.美国沃伦法院述评[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2005,42(4):47-54. 被引量:12

二级参考文献11

  • 1伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].中国政法大学出版社,1990.p,92.
  • 2Bernard Schwartz ,Stephan Lesher. Inside the Warren Court [ M ]. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc. , 1983.
  • 3Anthony Lewis. The Legacy of the Warren Court [ A]. Bernard Schwartz( ed. ). The Warren Court : A Retrospective [ C ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 4Bernard Schwartz. Main Currents in American Legal History [M]. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1993.
  • 5leon Friedman, Fred L. Israel( eds. ). The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789 - 1978: Their Lives and Major Opinions ( Vol.Ⅲ) [M]. New York : Chelsea House Publishers, 1980.
  • 6G. Edward White. The American Judicial Tradition: Profiles of Leading American Judges [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1976.
  • 7Tony Freyer, Hugo L. Black and the Warren Court in Retrospect [A]. Mark Tushnet(ed. ). The Warren Court in History and Political Perspective [ C ]. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993.
  • 8Alfred H. Kelly et al.. The American Constitution: Its Origins and Development [ M ]. New York : W. W. Norton & Company Inc. , 1983.
  • 9Kennit L. Hall. The Warren Court in Historical Perspective [A]. Bernard Schwartz(ed.). The Warren Court: A Retrospective [ C ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 10Paul L. Murphy. The Constitution in Crisis Times: 1918 - 1969 [M]. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1972.

共引文献14

同被引文献66

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部