期刊文献+

教师因素、学生因素对学生学业成绩影响的实证研究——基于大规模测验数据的多层线性模型分析 被引量:30

A Empirical Study on the Impact of Teacher's and Student's Factors to Their Academic Performance——Based on A Multi-Linear Analysis to A Large Scale Test Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用北京市义务教育阶段三年级学生大规模学业测验数据,对影响学生学业成绩的教师因素、学生因素进行分析。多层线性模型分析结果表明:学生学业成绩具有显著的班级间差异。来自于教师背景因素的教师性别、教龄和专业一致化程度,教师工作因素中的教师是否兼教等对班级学业成绩产生显著影响;来自于学生背景因素的学生性别、独生与否,学生学习因素中的学生自我教育期待、学习习惯、完成作业方式、课外阅读量、课外学习情况等对学生学业成绩产生显著影响。 This study examines the impact of the teacher' s and student' factors to their academic performance, based on an analysis to the test data from Beijing large scale 0ssessment in compulsory education. The teacher's factor includes their personal background and working styles, while student' s factor includes of their personal background and learning styles. Through a multilevel analysis, it found that: 1 ) Students' performance shows significant difference among classes ; 2) For the teacher's background factor, their gender, years of teaching, and knowledge background have significantly impact on the students' performance, while their educational level and academic title show no impact; 3 ) For the teacher' s working style factor, whether or not teaching different subject has significant impact on the student' s performance, while their week- ly instruction hours shows no impact; 4) For the student' s background factors, gender and single child or not show signifi- cant influence on their performance, while local or non - local identification has no influence; 5 ) For student' s learning style factor, their self education expectation, learning habit, homework completion, reading, and extracurricular study, all have significant impact on their learning, while hours for homework shows no influence.
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期56-62,共7页 Teacher Education Research
关键词 学业成绩 教师因素 学生因素 多层线性模型分析 students' academic performance teacher' s factor students' personal factors multi - linear model analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1OECD. School Factors Related to Quality and Equity -Re- suits from PISA 2000 [R]. OECD Publishing, 2005. 11 - 23.
  • 2Martin, M. O., Mullis, V. S., Robitaille, D. F., and Foy, P. TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Find- ings from IEA ' s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth and Fourth Grades [ R ]. Chestnut Hill, MA : Boston College, 2009. 5 - 11.
  • 3Jens Henrik, naahr et al. Explaining Student Performance: Evidence from International PISA, TIMSS, PRILS Surveys [ R ]. Danish Technological Institute, 2005. 4 - 22.
  • 4陈美好.国中师资与学习资源对学生学习成就之影响[R].中华民国第22届科学教育学术研讨会,2006.98-99.
  • 5OECD. Learning for Tomorrow's World- First Result from PISA 2003 [ R]. OECD Publishing, 2003. 95 - 102.
  • 6OECD. PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World [R]. OECD Publishing, 2006. 67-68. 215- 220.
  • 7OECD. PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Back- ground - Equating in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes [R]. OECD Publishing, 2010. 95.
  • 8中央教育科学研究所中小学生学业成就调查研究课题组,田慧生.我国小学六年级学生学业成就调查报告[J].教育研究,2011,32(1):27-38. 被引量:31
  • 9Mullis V. S. , Martin M. O. , Foy P. T1MSS 2007 Inter- national Mathematics Report [ R ]. 2008. 56 - 64.
  • 10Mullis V. S., Martin M. 0., Gonzalez E. J. , Chros- towski S. J. TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Re- port [R]. 2004. 47-54.

二级参考文献34

共引文献87

同被引文献445

引证文献30

二级引证文献301

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部