期刊文献+

AHP中判断矩阵一致性的可控标准 被引量:6

Consistency of Judgment Matrix in AHP Controlled Standard
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 将不完全一致性矩阵产生的"非一致性"偏差作为随机变量来对待,构造相应统计量,得出判定一致性的一个新标准,使决策者可以根据实际问题及个人偏好确定适当的置信水平进行一致性检验. Inconsistent deviations caused by incomplete consistency matrix were treated as random variables. Corresponding statistics was made and a new standard to determine the consistency was given. It can help the decision-makers determine the appropriate level of confidence to test consistency according to practical issues and personal preferences.
作者 梁晓辉
出处 《北华大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2012年第3期279-282,共4页 Journal of Beihua University(Natural Science)
关键词 层次分析法 一致性检验 置信水平 analytical hierarchy process consistency verification confidence level
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1董玉成,陈义华.层次分析法(AHP)中的检验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(7):105-110. 被引量:41
  • 2王应明,傅国伟.判断矩阵排序的X^2方法[J].管理工程学报,1994,8(1):26-32. 被引量:2
  • 3中山大学数学力学系.概论论与数理统计(下)第一版[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1980..
  • 4Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. New York: MC GrawHill, 1980.
  • 5Steuer R E. Multiple Criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 150(3): 496-515.
  • 6Vaidya O S, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of application [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169(1): 1-29.
  • 7William Ho. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications: A literature review [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 186(1): 211-228.
  • 8Saaty T L. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(7): 841-855.
  • 9Juan Aguaron, Jose Maria and Moreno-Jimenez. The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1): 137-145.
  • 10高世泽.概率统计引论[M】.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2002.

共引文献1690

同被引文献53

  • 1陈春琳,林大杨.等温吸附曲线方法在煤层气可采资源量估算中的应用[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(5):679-682. 被引量:63
  • 2李引擎.评价加拿大建筑消防安全的成本—效益风险评估模型[J].消防技术与产品信息,1996(8):35-41. 被引量:1
  • 3BAKER J, BOUCHLAGHEM D, EMMITY S. Categorisation of fire safety management: results of a Delphi panel [ J ]. Safety Science, 2013, 59:37-46.
  • 4USFA. Risk, hazard and value evaluation [ M]. Washington, U. S. : Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Fire Adminis- tration, 1999.
  • 5ZHOUHui(周慧).Study on standardization system of fire protec-tion management and evaluation indexD]. Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
  • 6OMIDVARI M, MANSOURI N, NOURI J. A pattern of fire risk as- sessment and emergency management in educational center laborato- ries[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 73(3) : 34 -42.
  • 7YANG Juntao, CHEN Ye. Research and application of fire risk as- sessment system for marketplace buildings [ J ]. Procedia Engineer- ing, 2014, 71:476-480.
  • 8GAO Junpeng, XU Zhisheng, LIU Dingli, et al. Application of the model based on fuzzy consistent matrix and AHP in the assess- ment of fire risk of subway tunnel [ J ]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 71:591 -596.
  • 9YAGMUR L. Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis for lo- calization equipment in a thermal power plant using the AHP[ J]. Energy, 2016, 94:476-482.
  • 10Fire Department of Ministry of Public Security. Comprehensive ability of fire safety technology[ M ]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2014.

引证文献6

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部