摘要
在一起"难办"案件中,法院贯彻执行了能动司法的政策,借助权利话语的修饰,做出了"圆满"的裁判。虽然这个裁判的合法律性令人质疑,却具有相当的公众可接受性。权利话语背后是法律实用主义,它以务实的态度满足社会需求,因此具有一定的正当性。在处于转型期的当下中国,法律实用主义是能动司法的实现模式,值得"认真对待"并审慎合理地适用。
The court applied the policy of judicial activism to a ＂hard case＂ and made a ＂perfect＂ decision with the rhetoric of rights. The decision has judicial acceptability while it is being suspected against the relative positive legal rules . What is underlying the decision is legal pragmatism. With the attitude of practicality, the legal pragmatism to some extent can meet social demands, and provide jurisdiction to judicial decisions and thus have legitimacy to certain extent. So, It should be taken seriously and can be cautiously and reasonably applied in the background of dynamic society.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期96-106,共11页
Law and Social Development
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"转型期积极权利的法律保障研究"(10YJC820034)
国家社科基金一般项目"自媒体时代网络传言的法律治理研究"(12BFX002)
中国博士后科学基金第四十七批资助项目
关键词
权利话语
生存权
司法能动
法律实用主义
the rhetoric of rights
subsistence right
judicial activism
legal pragmatism
