期刊文献+

兔急性心肌梗死后左心室重塑的MRI研究 被引量:4

MRI study of left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rabbit model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察兔急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心功能随时间演变的规律,探讨MRI影像特征及心功能指标的变化与左心室重塑的关系。方法日本长耳白兔45只,采用开胸结扎法建立心肌梗死模型。分别于术后即刻(0周)和术后1、2、4、6、8周共6个时间点行在体MR检查,测定各项心功能指标,包括:左心室舒张末期容积(EDV)、每搏输出量(SV)、射血分数(EF)、射血率峰值(PER)、充盈率峰值(PFR)。比较心肌梗死后心功能参数随时间变化的规律。在每个时间点随机取5只动物的心脏离体标本,行MR扩散张量成像(DTI),测量ADC值、各向异性分数(FA)值。不同时间点的心功能参数组间比较采用重复测量方差分析,各时间点梗死区心肌及不同区域心肌的FA值与ADC值的比较采用单因素方差分析,相邻2组均数的比较采用LSD-t检验。结果随着梗死时间的延长,左心室EDV呈现增加趋势,由术前的(2.21±0.35)ml增加到术后8周时的(3.15±0.57)ml,但差异无统计学意义(F=1.384,P=0.220)。EF则由(57.31±11.11)%下降至(34.71±8.72)%,呈明显下降趋势,差异有统计学意义(F=27.134,P=0.001)。EF随着EDV增加呈现下降趋势,线性回归分析得出一次方程:y=-5.58x+57.7(F=8.855,P=0.005)。随梗死时间的延长,PER由(27.31±13.06)ml/s下降至(17.31±6.41)ml/s(F=2.105,P=0.037),而PFR则由(23.79±14.15)ml/s下降至(12.07±6.91)ml/s(F=2.366,P=0.011)。梗死区FA值随着梗死时间的延长而下降,由0.442±0.093下降至0.107±0.037(F=12.61,P=0.001),而ADC值则由(5.07±1.15)×10^-4mm^2/s上升至(6.39±0.78)×10^-4mm^2/s(F=4.166,P=0.022),差异均有统计学意义。梗死区、边缘区和外围区的FA值分别为0.201±0.049、0.316±0.127、0.323±0.117,ADC值分别为(6.19±1.78)×10^-4、(5.44±2.63)×10^-4、(5.29±2.02)×10^-4mm^2/s,差异均有统计学意义(F=3.896,P=0.004;F=3.248,P=0.018)。FA、ADC值在梗死区与边缘区比较差异均有统计学意义(t=7.327,P=0.001;t=3.292,P=0.005),而边缘区和外围区的FA值、ADC值的差异无统计学意义(t=1.024,P=0.129;t=1.467,P=0.164)。结论MR心功能测定可以动态监测AMI后心室功能性重塑过程,通过DTI可以反映心室结构性重塑过程的心肌微观察结构的改变。MRI可以作为心肌梗死后左心室重塑的一种可行性的评价方法。 Objective To observe the change of cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rabbit model, and to study MRI characteristics of left ventricular remodeling (LVR). Methods Forty-five Japanese white rabbits underwent chest-opening coronary artery ligation surgery to obtain rabbit myocardial infarction model. The animals were scanned on a 1.5 T MR scanner ( GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) at six time-points as surgery, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 weeks after surgery. Cardiac function parameters were measured, including left ventricular end diastolic volume ( EDV ) , stroke volume ( SV ) , ejection fraction (EF), peak ejection rate (PER) and peak filling rate (PFR). At each time point,5 rabbits were randomly selected and performed re-thoracotomy to obtain heart specimen. Each specimen was examined by MRI with the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The value of ADC and fractional anisotrnpy (FA) were collected. Cardiac function data sets of different time points were analyzed using repeated measures data of ANOVA. The FA and ADC values of infarction myocardium set of different time points or different parts of the myocardium were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The average was compared statistically between two adjacent groups using LSD-t test. Results Left ventricular EDV increased in progress with the time. It was increased from (2. 21±0. 35 ) ml preoperatively to (3.15±0. 57)ml 8-week postoperatively. But the difference was not statistical significant ( F = 1. 384, P = 0. 220). EF was decreased from(57.31±11.11 )% to (34. 71±8.72)% . It dropped significantly and the difference was statistically significant (F = 27. 134, P = O. 001 ). EF showed a downward trend with the increase of EDV. By linear regression analysis, an equation was set up with y = - 5.58x + 57.7 ( F = 8. 855 ,P = 0. 005). On the other hand, PER showed a progressive decline from (27.31±13.06) ml/s to ( 17.31±6. 41 ) ml/s ( F = 2. 105, P = 0. 037), and PFR decreased from ( 23.79±14. 15 ) ml/s to ( 12.07±6. 91 ) ml/s ( F = 2. 366, P = 0. 011 ). FA value decreased from 0. 442±0. 093 to 0. 107 ±0. 037(F = 12. 61 ,P =0. 001 ) ,and ADC value showed upward trend from (5.07±1.15)×10-4 mm2/s to(6. 39±0.78 )×10-4 mm2/s (F = 4. 166,P = 0. 022 ). FA values of infarct, adjacent and remote region were 0. 201±0. 049, 0. 316 + 0. 127 and 0. 323×0. 117 respectively( F = 3. 896, P = 0. 004 ), and the ADC values in these regions were ( 6. 19±1.78 )×10 -4, ( 5.44±2. 63 )×10 -4, ( 5.29± 2. 02 )×10 -4 mm:/s respectively ( F = 3. 248, P = 0. 018 ). FA and ADC values were significantly different between the infarct region and adjacent region ( t = 7. 327, P = 0. 001 ;t = 3. 292, P = 0. 005, respectively), but there was no significantly different between adjacent region and remote region ( t = 1. 024, P = 0. 129 ; t = 1. 467, P = 0. 164, respectively ). Conclusions MRI measurement of parameters of cardiac function can be used to monitor the process of left ventricular function remodeling after AMI. The process of micro-structural remodeling of myocardium can he reflected by DTI. MRI provides a feasible imaging modality for LVR after AMI.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期645-649,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 国家“十一五”科技支撑计划资助项目(2007BAl05801)
关键词 心肌梗死 心室重构 磁共振成像 扩散 Myocardial infarction Ventricular remodeling Diffusion magnetic resonanceimaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1金国瑛,朱有法,杜月光.肌成纤维细胞在大鼠心肌梗死后心室重塑中的动态变化及意义[J].解剖学杂志,2011,34(2):260-261. 被引量:1
  • 2陈吉,雷蕾,陈建忠,韩烨,杨运旗,吴立荣.急性心肌梗死后心室重塑与脑钠肽的关系[J].中国心血管病研究,2007,5(12):908-910. 被引量:10
  • 3Wu EX, Wu Y, Nicholls JM, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging study of postinfarct myocardium structural remodeling in a porcine model. Magn Reson Med,2007, 58: 687-695.
  • 4Sutton MG, Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction : pathophysiology and therapy. Circulation, 2000,101 : 2981-2988.
  • 5Sharpe N. Left ventricular remodeling: pathophysiology and treatment. Heart Fail Monit,2003 ,4 :55-61.
  • 6Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling:concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 35: 569-582.
  • 7Opie LH, Commerford PJ, Gersh B J, et al. Controversies in ventricular remodelling. Lancet,2006,367:356-367.
  • 8Francis GS. Pathophysiology of chronic heart failure. Am J Med, 2001, 110 Suppl 7 :S37-46.
  • 9Clements IP. Combined systolic and diastolic dysfunction in the presence of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail,2005,7 : 490-497.
  • 10Chert J, Song SK, Liu W, et al. Remodeling of cardiac fiber structure after infarction in rats quantified with diffusion tensor MRI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,2003,285: H946-H954.

二级参考文献12

  • 1姜大朋,李昭铸,张玉波.肌成纤维细胞在创伤愈合中的地位和作用[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(13):158-160. 被引量:6
  • 2戴波,余细勇,陈一岳.细胞因子在心肌重构中的作用[J].国际病理科学与临床杂志,2006,26(2):122-125. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]Crilley JG,Farer M.Left ventricular remodeling and brain natriuretic peptide after first myocardial infarction.Heart,2001,86:638 -642.
  • 4[2]Nagaya N,Nishikimi T,Goto Y,et al.Plasma brainnatriuretic peptide is a biochemical marker for the prediction of progressive ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J,1998,135:21-28.
  • 5[3]Nagaya N,Goto Y,Nishikimi T,et al.Sustained elevation of plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels associated with progressive ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction.Clin Sci 1999,96:129-136.
  • 6[5]Yoshitomi Y,Nishikimi T,Kojima S,et al.Plasma natriuretic peptides as indicators of left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.Int J Cardiol,1998,64:153-160.
  • 7[6]Tjeerdsma G,de Boer RA,Boomsna F,et al.Rapid bedside measurement of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure.Int J Cardiol,2002,86:143-149.
  • 8Sun Y,Weber K T.Infarct scar:a dynamic tissue[J].Cardiovasc Res,2000,46(2):250-256.
  • 9Pfeffer J M,Pffeffer M A,Fletcher P J,et al.Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarction[J].Am J Physiol Heart Circ,1991,260(5):1406-1414.
  • 10Sun Y,Weber K T.Angiotensin converting enzyme and myofibro-blasts during tissue repair in the ratheart[J].J Mol Cell Cardio,1996,28(5):851-858.

共引文献9

同被引文献35

  • 1Thygesen K,Alpert JS,White HD,et al.Universal definition ofmyocardial infarction[J],Circulation,2007,116(22): 2634-2653.
  • 2Lund GK, Stork A,Muellerleile K,et al.Prediction of left ventric-ular remodeling and analysis of infarct resorption in patients withreperfused myocardial infarcts byusing contrast-enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,2007,245(1): 95-102.
  • 3Wu Y,Chan CW,Nicholls JM,et al.MR study of the effect of in-farct size and location on left ventric-ular functional and microstructuralalterations in porcine models[J].JMagn Reson Imaging,2009,9(2):305-312.
  • 4Parodi G,Carrabba N,SantoroGM,et al.Heart failure and left ven-tricular remodeling after reperfusedacute myocardial infarction in pa-tients with hypertension[J].Hyper-tension ?2006,47 C 4):706-710.
  • 5Kaandorp TA,Lamb HJ,Viergever EP,et al.Scar tissue on con-trast-enhanced MRI predicts left ventricular remodelling after a-cute infarction[J],Heart,2007,93(3):375-376.
  • 6Baer FM,Theissen P,Schneider CA,et al.Dobutamine magneticresonance imaging predicts contractile recovery of chronically dys-functional myocardium after successful revascularization[J].J AmColl CardioM998,31(5);1040-1048.
  • 7Schinkel AF,Bax JJ,Poldermans D,et al.Hibernating myocardi-um: diagnosis and patient outcomes[J].Curr Probl Cardiol,2007,32(7):375-410.
  • 8Glaveckaite S,Valeviciene N,Laucevicius A,et al.Cardiovascularmagnetic resonance imaging for detection of myocardial viability inchronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction[J].Medicina? 2009,45(8):585-599.
  • 9Redfield MM,Jacobsen SJ?Burnett Jr JC,et al.Burden of systolicand diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: apprecia-ting the scope of the heart failure epidemic[J].JAMA,2003,289(2):194-202.
  • 10Clements IP.Combined systolic and diastolic dysfunction in thepresence of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction[J].Eur JHeart Fail,2005,7(4):490-497.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部