期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG显像评价晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗疗效及预后 被引量:3

Evaluation on efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ^(18)F-FDG imaging
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨18F-FDG显像对评价晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)早期疗效及判断预后的价值。方法 32例晚期NSCLC患者分别在化疗前1周内及化疗后3周接受18F-FDG显像。对全部患者均随访1年,根据病灶影像学变化判断化疗疗效,并分为有效组和无效组,对比分析两组患者治疗前、后肿瘤与对侧正常组织放射性计数比值(T/N值)及其变化百分率(T/N变化百分率)与疗效和预后的关系,同时比较不同病理类型之间T/N值和T/N变化百分率的差异。通过ROC曲线找出判断疗效的最佳T/N变化百分率,以此数值为界将患者分为两组,绘制两组患者的1年累积生存曲线,Log-rank检验评估两组生存率的差异。结果有效组和无效组化疗前T/N值分别为7.41±3.91和6.97±2.49,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。有效组化疗3周后T/N值(5.43±2.86)低于无效组的8.51±4.61(t=2.18,P<0.05),有效组T/N变化百分率(-21.84±25.66)%低于无效组的(23.78±44.35)%(t=3.42,P<0.05)。鳞癌患者和腺癌患者在化疗前T/N值分别为8.35±2.56和6.35±3.30,化疗3周后分别为8.90±5.56和5.97±2.42,T/N变化百分率分别为(8.52±58.00)%和(0.61±30.20)%,差异均无统计学意义(P均≥0.05)。患者总体1年生存率为78.13%;有效组患者1年生存率为100%,高于无效组的61.11%(χ2=6.62,P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析得出评价疗效的最佳的T/N变化百分率为下降10%,其敏感度和特异度分别为88.9%和78.6%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89,T/N变化百分率下降超过10%组的1年生存率为100%,高于不足10%组的63.27%(χ2=5.76,P<0.05)。结论化疗后的T/N变化百分率可作为评价晚期NSCLC疗效和判断预后的重要参考指标。 Objective To explore the value of 18F-FDG imaging in assessing the early efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods Thirty-two patients with advanced NSCLC received 18F-FDG scan 1 week before and 3 weeks after chemotherapy.All patients were followed up for 1 year.The patients were divided into effective group and non-effective group according to the efficacy.The correlation of tumor to non-tumor(T/N) value and T/N declining percentage with curative effect was analyzed.The difference of T/N value and T/N declining percentage in the effect between pathological types was compared.According to ROC curve,the optional cutoff in the early prediction of therapeutic response was found.Log-rank tests were performed to assess the differences of survival rate.Results T/N value of effective group and non-effective group before therapy was 7.41±3.91 and 6.97±2.49,respectively(P0.05).T/N value of effective group 3 weeks after chemotherapy(5.43±2.86) was lower than non-effective group(8.51±4.61,t=2.18,P0.05).T/N value percentage change of effective group([-21.84±25.66]%) was lower than non-effective group([23.78±44.35]%,t=3.42,P0.05).Before chemotherapy,T/N value of the squamous cell carcinoma and the adenocarcinoma was 8.35±2.56 and 6.35±3.30,while 3 weeks after chemotherapy was 8.90±5.56 and 5.97±2.42,respectively.T/N value percentage change of the two groups was(8.52±58.00)% and(0.61±30.20)%,respectively(all P≥0.05).The overall 1 year survival rate was 78.13%,of the effective group was 100%,of non-effective group was 61.11%(χ2=6.62,P0.05).Using ROC curve,the optional cutoff in early prediction of therapeutic response was declining percentage 10%,the sensitivity and specificity was 88.9% and 78.6%,respectively,the area under curve(AUC) was 0.89.The 1 year survival rate of patients with T/N value percentage change over or lower than 10% was 100% and 63.27%,respectively(χ2=5.76,P0.05).Conclusion T/N value percentage change is an important parameter which can early predict therapeutic response and prognosis for advanced NSCLC.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期929-933,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 非小细胞肺 18F氟脱氧葡萄糖 放射性核素显像 治疗 预后 Carcinoma non-small-cell lung Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Radionuclide imaging Therapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Wong CY,Schmidt J,Bong JS,et al.Correlating metabolic andanatomic responses of primary lung cancers to radiotherapy bycombined 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging.Radiat Oncol,2007,2:18.
  • 2宋吉清,张成琪,陈静,刘庆伟,姚树展,刘松涛.^(18)F-FDG PET-CT在肺癌疗效监测中的临床应用价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2006,16(2):113-115. 被引量:4
  • 3Cerfolio RJ,Bryant AS,Ojha B.Restaging patients with N2(stageⅢa)non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemora-diotherapy:A prospective study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2006,131(6):1229-1235.
  • 4de Geus-Oei LF,van der Heijden HF,Visser EP,et al.Chemo-therapy response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in patients withnon-small cell lung cancer.J Nucl Med,2007,48(10):1592-1598.
  • 5Pottgen C,Levegrün S,Theegarten D,et al.Value of 18F-fluo-ro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computedtomography in non-small-cell lung cancer for prediction of patho-logic response and times to relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradio-therapy.Clin Cancer Res,2006,12(1):97-106.
  • 6Berghmans T,Dusart M,Paesmans M,et al.Primary tumorstandardized uptake value(SUVmax)measured on fluorodeoxyglu-cose positron emission tomography(FDG-PET)is of prognosticvalue for survival in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC):A sys-tematic review and meta-analysis(MA)by the European LungCancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Pro-ject.J Thorac Oncol,2008,3(1):6-12.
  • 7Steinert HC.PET in lung cancer.Chang Gung Med J,2005,28(5):296-305.
  • 8Lee DH,Kim SK,Lee HY,et al.Early prediction of response tofirst-line therapy using integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for patientswith advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.J ThoracOncol,2009,4(7):816-821.
  • 9Zhang HQ,Yu JM,Meng X,et al.Prognostic value of serial[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stageⅢpatientswith non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradio-therapy.Eur J Radiol,2011,77(1):92-96.
  • 10Obrzut S,Bykowski J,Badran K,et al.Utility of fluorodeox-yglucose-positron emission tomography in the identification ofnew lesions in lung cancer patients for the assessment of therapyresponse.Nucl Med Commun,2010,31(12):1008-1015.

二级参考文献12

  • 1吴湖炳,王全师,王明芳,郭晓君,唐刚华.^(18)F-FDGPET显像半定量分析与肺癌病理类型及分期的关系[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(1):29-31. 被引量:30
  • 2ZHANG Zhen-jiang,CHEN Jing-han,MENG Long,DU Jia-jun,ZHANG Lin,LIU Ying,DAI Hong-hai.^(18)F-FDG uptake as a biologic factor predicting outcome in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(2):125-131. 被引量:17
  • 3Lardinois D, Wedex W, Hany TF,et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography[J]. N Engl J Med,2003,348:2500-2507.
  • 4Frank A, Lefkowitz D, Jaeger S, et al. Decision logic for retreatment of asymptomatic lung cancer recurrence based on positron emission tomography finding[J]. Int J Radiat Oncel Biol Phys,1995,32:1495-1512.
  • 5Patz EF Jr, Lowe VJ, Heffman JM, et al. Persistent or recurrent bronchogenic carcinoma: detection with PET and 2-[F-18]-2-denxy-D-glucase[J]. Radiology, 1994,191:379 - 382.
  • 6Inoue T, Kim EE, Komaki R, et al. Detecting recurrent or residual lung cancer with FDG-PET[J]. J Nuel Med,1995,36:788- 793.
  • 7Keidar Z, HaimN, Guralnik L, et al. PET/CT using F^8-FDG in suspected lung cancer recurrence: diagnostic value and impact on patient managemont[J]. J Nucl Med,2004,45 : 1640 - 1646.
  • 8Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Matthews JP, et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncel, 2003, 21:1285 -1292.
  • 9Holloway CL, Robinson D, Murray B, et al. Results of a phase Ⅰ study to dose escalate using intensity modulated radiotherapy guided by combined PET/CT imaging with induction chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Radiother Oncel,2004,73:285-287.
  • 10Steinert HC. PET in lung cancer[J]. Chang Gung Med J,2005,28:296- 305.

共引文献20

同被引文献52

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1831
  • 2李现军,李凤岐,韩建奎,赵志华,宋振国,代学之.18F-FDG PET/CT检查中腹腔积液SUV对不明原因腹腔积液的辅助诊断价值[J].中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(6). 被引量:22
  • 3KangH, Lee HY, Lee KS, et al. Imaging-based tumor treatmentresponse evaluation: Review of conventional, new, and emergingconcepts. Korean J Radiol, 2012,13(4) :371-390.
  • 4Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al. Interobserver andintraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcino-ma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response. JClin Oncol, 2003,21(13):2574-2582.
  • 5Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelinesto evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. EuropeanOrganization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, NationalCancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute ofCanada. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(3) : 205-216.
  • 6Firmino M, Morais AH, Mendoca RM, et al. Computer-aideddetection system for lung cancer in computed tomography scans:Review and future prospects. Biomed Eng Online, 2014,13:41.
  • 7Gietema HA, Wang Y, Xu D, et al. Pulmonary nodules detectedat lung cancer screening : Interobserver variability of semiauto-mated volume measurements. Radiology, 2006,241(1) :251-257.
  • 8Henschke Cl, Yankelevitz DF,Yip R, et al. Lung cancers diag-nosed at annual CT screening: Volume doubling times. Radiolo-gy, 2012,263(2):578-583.
  • 9Revel MP, Merlin A, Peyrard S, et al. Software volumetricevaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus ma-lignant pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006,187(1):135-142.
  • 10赖智峰.18F-FDG PET/CT联合增强CT对胰腺癌可切除性评价的临床应用价值[J].南方医科大学,2013.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部