摘要
源于对同一主体学术影响力评价的认识,新型的下载频次指标与当前主流的被引频次指标应具有内在的统一性,但用户认知水平和行为方式的不同以及引用和下载的不同决策模式及其在文献利用行为中的不同地位决定了两者的差异。基于CNKI期刊库,从论文、期刊和机构三个层次考察两种指标的分布状态,分析两者之关联乃至引用与下载的行为特点,研究下载频次所呈现的特征并与被引频次比较,以考察其作为评价指标的合理性和可用性。
The new type of download indicator and the mainly used citation indicator share some inner unity as they both evaluate a subjeetg academic influence. However, different user cognition modes and behavior habits, along with the fact that citing and down- loading behaviors display varied decision-making patterns, lead to the differences between the two types of indicators. Basing on CNKI journal database, this paper investigates the distribution and relativity between download and citation indicators on the level of paper, source journal and research institution, which illustrate characteristics of citation and download behaviors. By comparing the feature of download indicator and that of citation, it can find out whether the former can be taken as a reliable indicator for evaluation.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第8期56-64,共9页
Library and Information Service
基金
国家大学生创新实验计划"网络环境下引文网络形成的机理与影响因素研究:基于知识转移的视角"
校级大学生科研训练计划"网络环境下文献下载与引文的交互作用及影响因素研究"研究成果之一
关键词
被引频次
下载频次
相关性
citation indicator download indicator relativity
