摘要
目的对比应用"商环"行包皮环切与传统包皮环切术两种术式的临床疗效。方法对167例包皮过长、包茎患者,行商环包皮环切术81例(商环组)、行传统包皮环切术86例(传统组)。对其术式优越性、安全性进行对比分析。结果行商环包皮环切术组在手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症、术后阴茎美观方面优于行传统包皮环切组,两者有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用"商环"行包皮环切术操作简单、安全可靠、并发症少,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effects between shang ring circumcision and conventional circumcision.Methods 81 patients were taken operations with shang ring circumcision（shang ring group） and 86 patients underwent the conventional circumcision（conventional group） randomly.They were compared in operation time,blood loss and postoperative complications.Results Compared with the conventional group,the shang ring group experienced significantly shorter operation time,less blood loss and postoperative complications（P 0.05）,and had advantages of neat incisions,and good outlook of penis.Conclusion Shang ring circumcision is simple and convenient with shorter operative time,less blood loss.It is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国医药导报》
CAS
2012年第9期168-168,F0003,共2页
China Medical Herald
关键词
商环包皮环切
传统包皮环切
包皮过长
包茎
Shang ring circumcision
Conventional circumcision
Redundant prepuce
Phimosis
