期刊文献+

基于多利益相关者视角的耕地利用与保护研究 被引量:12

Arable land use analysis and countermeasures based on multi-stakeholders' knowledge
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究目的:了解不同利益群体对当地耕地利用的看法,明确当地耕地利用中存在的主要问题。研究方法:以山西省宁武县上余庄村为例,在遥感影像解译的基础上结合实地调查得到当地的土地利用现状以及耕地利用状况,采用"参与式农村评估"的方法,从农民、技术人员和基层管理人员等多利益相关者的角度分析耕地利用出现的问题及他们的看法。研究结果:(1)研究区域耕地面积为90.91hm2,占土地总面积的18.3%,但其中撂荒地有15hm2左右,约占到了耕地面积的15%,表明虽然耕地从总量上保持了动态平衡,但实际耕作率却在下降;(2)无论是农民、技术人员和管理人员,对本地的耕地利用情况都不满意。耕地撂荒的主要原因是种地不挣钱,其次是土地沙化难以耕种;耕地减少的主要原因是退耕还林,耕地退化。研究结论:参与式农村评估方法可以获得不同利益群体的看法和意见,是研究土地利用与保护的一个有力工具。 The purpose of this study is to understand the multi - stakeholders" attitude towards arable land use and to clarify the main problems on arable land protection and utilize. Methods of remote sensing image interpre- tation and field survey were used to analyze the arable land use status quom of Shangyuzhuang Village, Ningwu County, Shanxi province. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) was applied to collect the opinions of Multi - stakeholder which included farmers, technical staff and primary management staff on arable land use from their own view. The results indicated that the total arable lands kept balance, but the real farming rate was still de- creasing; Neither of these stakeholders was satisfied with the status quo of the local arable land use, and the main reason of abandoning arable land was unprofitable. The conclusion showed PRA is an appropriate method on land use and protection research.
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期126-131,共6页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(08JC630054) 山西省国土资源厅专项课题(0905908)资助
关键词 耕地保护与利用 参与式农村评估 多利益相关者 半结构访谈 arable land protection and utilize Participatory Rural Appraisal Multi - stakeholder semi - struc- tured interviews
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1梁流涛,曲福田,王春华.基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(2):242-246. 被引量:116
  • 2赵静.我国农村耕地利用及保护对策[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(9):839-840. 被引量:3
  • 3王俊玲,吴克宁,吕巧灵.县级耕地利用中存在的问题及对策研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(1):147-150. 被引量:6
  • 4Hahn A.Institutionalising participation on village levele the example of one community in south-west Burkina Faso.In:Scherler,C.,Forster,R.(Eds.),Beyond the Toolkit:Experiences with Institutionalising Participatory Approaches of GTZ-supported Projects in Rural Areas[M].GTZ,Eschborn,1998.
  • 5Patel M,Kok K,Rothman D S.Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis:An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder in-volvement in the Northern Mediterranean[J].Land Use Policy,2007,24:546-561.
  • 6Thapa G B,Niroula G S.Alternative options of land consolidation in the mountains of Nepal:An analysis based on stakeholders'opinions[J].Land Use Policy,2008,25:338-350.
  • 7Prager K,Freese J.Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making-Learning from a local-and a state-level approach in Ger-many[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2009,90:1154-1167.
  • 8Reed MS,Graves A,Dandy N,et al.Who's in and why?Atypology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management[J].Journalof Environmental Management,2009,90:1933-1949.
  • 9Wang X J,Yu Z R,Cinderby S,Forrester J.Enhancing participation:Experiences of participatory geographic information systems in Shanxi prov-ince[J].Applied Geography,2008,28:96-109.
  • 10Chabot M,Duhaime G.Land-use planning and participation:the case of Inuit public housing[J].Habitat Intl,1998,22(4):429-447.

二级参考文献36

共引文献181

同被引文献195

引证文献12

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部