期刊文献+

连续臂丛阻滞镇痛对断指再植术后肢体的保护作用 被引量:2

EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT - CONTROLLED ANALGESIA USING BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK ON PROTECTING THE FINGER AFTER REPLANTATION
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察连续臂丛阻滞术后自控镇痛对断指再植术后肢体的保护作用。方法对80例上肢单指完全离断伤行断指再植病人,随机分为两组,每组40例,A组为连续臂丛阻滞镇痛组:B组不行镇痛。观察两组分别于麻醉前1h(T1),手术后4h(T2),12h(T3),24h(T4)四个时段抽取肘静脉血测定丙二醛(MDA)、谷胱甘肽(GSH)及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)血浆浓度。结果手术前1h(T1)两组MDA、GSH、SOD无明显差异;与T1相比,A组MDA在T2、T3、T4时显著降低(P<0.01),GSH、SOD均显著增高(P<0.01);与A组比较,B组T2、T3、T4时MDA均显著增高(P<0.01),GSH、SOD则显著降低(P<0.01)。结论连续臂丛阻滞术后自控镇痛能够有效地预防肢体缺血再灌注损伤,可有效保护断肢再植术后肢体。 Objective To observe the effect of continuous postoperative patient - controlled analgesia using brachial plexus block on protecting the finger after replantaion. Methods 80 patients who suffer from finger separation were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received continuous postoperative patient - controlled analgesia, Group B was control group. Before anesthesia 1 hour ( T1 ), postopertive 4 hours ( T2 ), 12 hours ( T3 ) ,24 hours ( T4), two group drawn venous blood to test concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase(SOD). Results There was no significant difference between two groups in MDA, GSH and SOD before operation. For group A, MDA decreased significantly in T2, T3, T4(p 〈0. 01 ), but GSH and SOD increased significantly(p 〈0. 01 ). For group B, MDA increased significantly in T2, T3, T4 (p 〈 0. 01 ), but GSH and SOD decreased significantly(p 〈0. 01). Conclusion Continuous postoperative patient - controlled analgesia using braehial plexus block can effectively prevent finger from ischemia - reperfusion injury and protect the finger after replantaion.
出处 《现代医院》 2012年第3期39-40,共2页 Modern Hospitals
关键词 缺血再灌注损伤 自控镇痛 臂丛阻滞 断指再植 lschemia- reperfusion injury, Patient- controlled analgesia, Brachial plexus block, Replata-lion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献9

共引文献31

同被引文献18

  • 1张世民,侯春林,俞光荣,袁锋.翻转筋膜皮下瓣修复四肢创面[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2005,19(7):531-532. 被引量:9
  • 2崔旭蕾,徐仲煌,郭向阳,任洪智.小儿外周神经阻滞的临床应用进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):702-704. 被引量:37
  • 3Fleischmann E, Marhofer P, Greher M, et al. Brachial plexus an- aesthesia in children: lateral infraclavicular vs axillary approach [J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2003,13(2): 103-108.
  • 4P/ilve H, Kirvel/i O, Olin H, et al. Maximum recommended doses of lignoeaine are not toxic[J]. Br J Anaesth,1995,74(6):704-705.
  • 5Ilfeld BM, Le LT, Ramjohn J, et al. The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study[J]. Anesth Analg,2009, 108( 1 ):345-350.
  • 6Neal JM, Hebl JR, Gerancher JC, et al. Brachial plexus anesthe- sia: essentials of our current understanding[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2002,27(4):402-428.
  • 7Marhofer P, Sitzwohl C, Greher M, et al. Ultrasound guidance lbr infraclavicular brachial plexus anaesthesia in children[J]. Anaes- thesia,2004.59(7):642-646.
  • 8Ilfeld BM, Moeller LK, Mariano ER, et al. Continuous pripheral nerve blocks: is local anesthetic dose the only factor, or do con- centration and volume influence infusion effects as well?[J]. Anes- thesiology,2010,112(2):347-354.
  • 9兰天兵,曾艺平,聂建雄.游离静脉筋膜瓣在再植术中的应用[J].实用手外科杂志,2008,22(4):229-229. 被引量:4
  • 10唐毅,耿智隆,汪惠文.神经刺激仪引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞罗哌卡因半数有效浓度的研究[J].西北国防医学杂志,2010,31(2):111-113. 被引量:14

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部