期刊文献+

CBA 2010-2011赛季各队攻防实力对比与竞争格局分析 被引量:54

A comparison of the offense and defense strengths of teams in CBA game season 2010-2011 and an analysis of the structure of competition
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对CBA 2010-2011赛季各队的攻守能力进行研究后发现:联赛成绩较好的球队具有较强且较均衡的攻防能力。据最佳分档准则,结合合理分档数表,可将CBA职业联赛竞争格局分为3档。强队在进攻指标(得分、2分率、3分率、罚篮率、进攻篮板、助攻)和防守指标(失分、抢断、犯规和盖帽)方面占有明显的优势。不同档次球队之间存在显著性或极显著性差异。而比赛中各方失误的几率大致均等,在防守篮板方面也不存在显著性差异。运用TOPSIS法与RSR法对篮球职业俱乐部队综合评价及格局划分具有一定的可靠性和参考价值。 Having studied the offense and defense capacities of teams in CBA game season 2010-2011, the author found that teams with good tournament performances had a more powerful and balanced offense and defense capacity. According to the best classification rule, coupled with a rational classification datasheet, the structure of competition in professional CBA tournament can be divided into 3 classes. High performance teams had distinct advantages in terms of offense indexes (score, 2-point rate, 3-point rate, free throw rate, offensive rebound, assistant offense) and defense indexes (points lost, steals, fouls, block shots). There was a significant or extremely significant difference between teams in different classes, while the teams in the games had a roughly identical error rate, and no significant difference in terms of offensive rebound. The comprehensive evaluation and structure classification of professional basketball clubs by applying TOPSIS and RSR methods are provided with certain reliability and a reference value.
作者 曹卫华
出处 《体育学刊》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期109-115,共7页 Journal of Physical Education
关键词 训练与竞赛 中国男子篮球职业联赛 职业俱乐部 攻防能力 竞争格局 training and competition CBA professional club offense and defense capacity structure of competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献41

共引文献414

同被引文献265

引证文献54

二级引证文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部