摘要
本文从话语构建的角度对比分析了东西方历史文本《史记》和《剑桥中国史》对同一历史事件"商鞅变法"的历史叙述异同,指出两者在文本内容和形式上的差异主要表现在立足点、叙述深度和时间指示、结构编排、叙述语选择上。而后本文探讨了对比分析所反映出的历史叙述"曲解故事"的基调和其通过深层话语空间所展现的价值判断立场,特别对客观史实叙述中的主观认知倾向进行了讨论,认为历史叙述的意义并不是普遍意义上理解的客观展现过去的事实,而是通过话语构建的方式传承民族文化中的价值观立场。
The thesis compares Chinese historic text Shih Chi and the western one The Cambridge History of China on the same event of Shang Yang,and discovers their differences in historic narration from the angle of discourse construction.Their differences of contents and styles rest on narrating standpoint,profundity and the reference of time,the forms of text structure and the choice of words.On the basis of the comparative analysis,the thesis discusses the historic narration’s misrepresenting of event and its value judgment through inter-structured discourse space.The objective historic narration still cannot avoid the in-clination of subjective interpretation.The thesis states that the meaning of historic narration is not to present the past reality in common sense,but to pass on value judgment in national culture through the way of discourse construction.
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2012年第1期47-50,128,共5页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
关键词
《史记》
《剑桥中国史》
历史叙述
话语
价值判断
Shih Chi
The Cambridge History of China
Historic narration
Discourse
Value judgment
