摘要
依靠非诉讼方式解决水事纠纷常能取得意想不到的积极效果。我国采用非诉讼方式解决水事纠纷历史悠久。然而,我国在解决这类纠纷时方式单一且技巧贫乏。针对我国水事纠纷非诉讼解决方式存在的缺陷,借鉴美国此类领域的学理研究成果及丰富经验,我们发现,民间调解等多元非诉讼解决方式应在我国实践中被提倡和运用。这些丰富的纠纷解决方式应当何时被运用、如何被运用、运用时需要注意的事项和相关技巧等问题应被深入探讨和认知,以此来促进我国水事纠纷有效而完满的解决。
It is efficient to resolve water disputes by Alterative Dispute Resolutions. In China, ADR is a traditional way to solve water disputes. However, the administrative mediation and the juridical mediation are main ways. The resolution styles and tech- niques are limited in the area of water disputes. Based on the analysis of these limitations and American advanced research expe- rience, it is found that diversiform ADR should be applied to get more satisfied resolutions. Moreover, many academic questions need to be focused, such as the exact meaning of ADR; the circumstances of the application; the techniques of the application and so on.
出处
《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2012年第2期117-122,共6页
Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
水事纠纷
非诉讼方式
ADR
调解
Water Disputes
Aherative Disputes Resolutions
ADR
Mediation
