期刊文献+

肝硬化患者肾血流灌注的超声造影研究 被引量:1

Study on renal perfusion of patients with liver cirrhosis by contrast-enhanced ultrasound
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用实时超声造影技术结合时间-强度曲线定量评价不同程度肝硬化患者肾血流灌注情况。方法常规肾功能正常的肝硬化患者40例,据肝功能Child—Pugh分级法分为Child—PughA级组14例,B级组14例,c级组12例。以30例正常人为对照,比较不同程度肝硬化患者肾血流灌注及时间一强度曲线量化参数,并与Child—Pugh评分进行关联性分析。结果与正常组比较,肝硬化组肾皮质血流灌注峰值强度减低,达峰时间延长,曲线下面积减小(P〈0.05);与A级组比较,B级组峰值强度减低,c级组峰值强度减低、达峰时间延长(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。峰值强度与肝硬化组Child—Pugh评分呈负相关(r=-0.506,P〈0.01)。结论超声造影结合时间-强度曲线可定量评估不同程度肝硬化患者肾血流灌注,峰值强度与肝硬化的病变程度密切相关。 Objective To assess the renal perfusion of different severity of hepatic cirrhosis by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with time-intensity curve. Methods Forty hepatic cirrhosis patients with normal conventional renal function enrolled the study and were subdivided into Child-Pugh A group ( n = 14) ,Child Pugh B group ( n = 14) and Child-Pugh C group ( n = 12). Thirty healthy subjects were selected as the control group. The parameters of perfusion were compared among the groups. The correlations between parameters and score of Child-Pugh were analyzed using Pearson correlation. Results The cirrhosis groups showed a decrease of peak intensity,increase of time to peak,and reduce of area under the curve in the renal cortex( P 〈0.05). Compared with Child-Pugh A group, the peak intensity decreased in both Child- .Pugh B and C groups,time to peak increased in Child-Pugh C group( P〈0.05 or P 〈0.01). The peak intensity had negative correlation with Child-Pugh score( r = - 0. 506, P 〈0.01). Conclusions Contrast enhanced ultrasound combined with time-intensity curve can assess renal perfusion of hepatic cirrhosis quantitatively. The peak intensity was correlated to the severity of cirrhosis.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期213-216,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 基金项目:山西省科技攻关项目(20100311097-3,20110321077-02)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 肝硬化 肾循环 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Liver cirrhosis Renal circulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Guevara M, Arroyo V. Hepatorenal syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2011,12 : 1405-1417.
  • 2Venkat D, Venkat KK. Hepatorenal syndrome. South Med J, 2010,103:654-661.
  • 3Gines P,Schrier RW. Renal failure in cirrhosis. New Engl J Med, 2009,361 : 1279-1290.
  • 4Nguyen GC, Sergev DL, Thuluvath PJ. Nationwide increase in hospitalizations and hepatitis C among in patients with cirrhosis and sequelae of portal hypertension. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007,5 : 1092-1099.
  • 5Girard MS, Mattrey RF, Baker KG, et al. Comparison of standard and second harmonic B-mode sonography in the detection of segmental renal infarction with sonographic contrast in a rabbit model. J Ultrasound Med,2000,19 : 185-192.
  • 6Linder JR, Song J, Jayaweera AR, et al. Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J Am Soe Echocardiogr, 2002,15: 396-403.
  • 7Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coil Cardiol,2001,37:1135- 1140.
  • 8Quaia E, Bertolotto M. Renal parenchymal diseases: is characterization feasible with ultrasound? Eur Radiol, 2002, 12: 2006-2020.
  • 9王健,康春松,徐琨,李虹,李嵘娟.实时灰阶超声造影研究兔肾血流灌注[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2008,17(1):69-72. 被引量:8
  • 10王健,康春松,李嵘娟,徐琨,李虹.实时灰阶超声造影评价肾动脉狭窄血流灌注的实验研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(10):1449-1452. 被引量:4

二级参考文献49

共引文献40

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部