国内贸易的壁垒因素与边界效应——自然分割和政策壁垒被引量：27

Domestic Trade Barriers and Border Effect-the Natural Segmentation and Policy Barriers

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文通过引入适合于我国省份层面的国内贸易边界效应模型,利用1997、2002、2005和2006年的相关样本,具体考察了影响我国国内贸易的两个层面壁垒因素。在控制了距离等自然壁垒变量后,实证得出了我国样本期的边界效应值为16.78,且1997-2002年和2002-2005年两个期间平均的省份边界效应具有上升的趋势(其中后个时期上升趋势明显走弱,显示边界效应的收敛趋势),而2005年之后则具有下降趋势;结果认为地方产业结构雷同对区际贸易具有阻碍作用,财政分权下的政府保护偏好是导致贸易壁垒的重要因素,省份的对外贸易对区际贸易具有替代效应,而经济结构和政策壁垒的总体边界效应达3.90。 This article introduces border effect model of China＇ s domestic trade, and uses the data of year 1997,2002,2005 and 2006 to study the impact of two levels of internal trade barriers. After controlling variables such as natural barriers, the estimation shows the average border effect is 16.78, and the provincial border effect has a rising trend during the period of 1997 - 2002 and 2002 - 2005, while after 2005 it shows a downward trend. It＇ s concluded that the more similar the industrial structure, the greater the resistance of trade. Fiscal decentralization under the protection of government is an important factor which leads to trade barrier, while foreign trade of the provinces shows a substitution effect on interregional trade, and the total border effect of both economic structure and policy barriers is 3.90.

作者赵永亮

机构地区暨南大学经济学院

出处《南方经济》 CSSCI 2012年第3期13-22,36,共11页 South China Journal of Economics

基金国家社科基金重点项目<后危机时代全球分工发展趋势及其对我国经济发展的影响>(2010) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重大攻关项目(2010) 广东省高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划资助项目 2011年广东省自然科学基金<广东省内外贸易需求的双推动战略研究>(项目批准号:04C003436)的资助

关键词国内贸易边界效应政策壁垒 Domestic Trade Border Effcet Policy Barrier

分类号 F121 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Anderson, J. E. , and E. van Wincoop, 2003, " Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, 20 (1). pp. 170-192.
2Chen Natalie, 2004, "Intra - national Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matters," Journal of International Economics, 63, pp. 20 - 45.
3Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel, Kortum, 2002, "Technology, Geography, and Trade," Econometrica, 70 (5), pp 1741-1779.
4Gil - Pareja. et al. , 2004, "The Border Effect in Spain." World Economy. 28. PP. 1617 - 1631.
5Head, Keith and Mayer, Thierry, 2002, "Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Home Bias in Trade, "' Manuscript, CEPII, January. Krugman, P. , 1991, ".
6Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 483 - 499.
7Matthias Helble, 2006, "Border Effect Estimates for France and Germany Combining International Trade and Intra - national Transport Flows," HEI Working Paper. McCallum, John, 1995, "National borders matter: Canada - U. S. regional trade patterns," American Economic Review , 85, pp. 615 - 623.
8Naughton, B. , 1999, "How Much Can Regional Integration Do to Unify China' s Markets," University of California at San Diego Mimeo.
9Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2004, "Spatial Effects of European Integration: Do Border Regions Benefit Above Average?" HWWA discussion paper. No. 307.
10Nitsch, Volker, 2000. "National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union," Canadian Journal of Economics, 33 (4), pp. 1091 -1105.