期刊文献+

两种新辅助化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌的近期疗效比较 被引量:4

The clinical recent effects of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较新辅助化疗方案紫杉醇(PTX)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)/甲酰四氢叶酸钙(LV)(PF方案)和奥沙利铂(L-OHP)联合5-Fu/LV(FOLFOX方案)用于进展期胃癌综合治疗的近期疗效。方法60例临床确诊的进展期胃癌(Ⅲ-Ⅳ期)患者随机分为PF组和FOLFOX组,每组各30例,分别采用PF和FOLFOX方案进行新辅助化疗3周期,比较两种化疗方案对进展期胃癌的近期疗效和不良反应。结果PF组化疗后总有效率77.67%,FOLFOX组总有效率50.00%,两组差异有统计学意义(x^2=4.59,P〈0.05);两组白细胞减少、转氨酶升高及恶心和腹泻程度相似;PF组脱发程度较重,但两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);FOL-FOX组末梢神经感觉异常明显,两组差异有统计学意义(x^2=5.08,P〈0.05)。结论PF化疗方案近期疗效显著,耐受性好。 Objective To observe the recent effects and toxicity in advanced gastric carcinoma by two kinds of neoadjuvant chemotherapies ( PF and FOLFOX). Methods A total of 60 patients with advanced gastric cancer (Ⅲ-Ⅳ ) , they were randomly divided into 2 groups ; PF group ( 30 cases) and FOLFOX group ( 30 cases). All patients were given 3 cycles of docetaxel or L-OHP chemotherapy preoperatively, to observe the recent effects and toxicity in advanced gastric carcinoma. Results The total effective rate in PF group was 77.67 %, while it was 50.00% in FOLFOX group,it had significant difference between in two groups ( x^2 = 4.59, P 〈 0.05 ). There is no difference in the incidence of neutropenia, transaminase elevation, nausea and diarrhea two groups. The incidence of hair loss in PF group is higher than in FOLFOX group, but there is no difference between two groups;The incidence of peripheral nerve paresthesia in FOLFOX group is higher than that in PF group ( x^2 = 5.08, P 〈 0.05). Conclusion PF as neo- adjuvant chemotherapy is a very effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2012年第3期337-338,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 胃肿瘤 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 紫杉醇 奥沙利铂 Stomach neoplasms Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols Docetaxel Oxaliplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献32

共引文献32

同被引文献48

  • 1Cammerer G, Formentini A, Karletshofer M, et al. Evaluation ofimportant prognostic clinical and pathological factors in gastriccancer. Anticancer Res, 2012, 32(5): 1839-1842.
  • 2Domen H, Ohara M, Noguchi M, et al. Long-term survival ofresected advanced gastric cancer with hepatic and pancreaticinvasion. Case Rep Gastroenterol, 2011,5(2): 396-403.
  • 3Mastoraki S, Mastoraki A, Lefantzis N, et al. Controversies andchallenging therapeutic modalities in gastric cancer. Indian J Surg,2011,73(4): 251-255.
  • 4Sung EZ,Arasaradnam RP,Jarvie EM,et al. Effects of neo-adjuvantchemotherapy for oesophago-gastric cancer on neuro-musculargastric function. Mol Biol Rep, 2012, 39( 12) : 9989-9994.
  • 5Luo HY,Xu RH,Wang F, et al. Phase II trial of XELOX as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer.Chemotherapy, 2010,56(2): 94-100.
  • 6Mezhir JJ, Tang LH, Coit DG. Neoadjuvant therapy of locallyadvanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol, 2010, 101(4) : 305-314.
  • 7Fujitani K.Overview of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for re-sectable gastric cancer in the East[J].Dig Surg,2013,30(2):119-129.
  • 8Chen SS,Yang XC,Chi F,et al.A phase II study of preoperativechemotherapy with modified F0LF0X6 followed by surgery andpostoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric ad-enocarcinoma[J].Oncol Res,2013,20(7):327-332.
  • 9周堃,纪俊标.DI期胃癌新辅助化疗效果的临床分析[J].基础与临床,2010,36(19):2333-2334.
  • 10Ajani JA, Fairweather J, Dumas P, et al. Phase II study of Taxol in patients with advancedgastric carcinoma [ J ]. Cancer J Sci Am, 1998,4(3) :269-274.

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部