跨学科的语言磨蚀研究——从语言磨蚀的定义谈起被引量：28

A Study on Language Attrition with an Interdisciplinary View ——A Discussion on the Definition of Language Attrition

导出

摘要从国内外语言磨蚀的相关成果看,其定义不统一,理论层面分析也不足。结合语言磨蚀理论研究的最新成果,本研究重点考察其国内外不同的定义,从生理学、心理学、认知科学、普通语言学、神经认知语言学以及社会语言学等学科方面,重新审视语言磨蚀的定义,对影响语言磨蚀的相关因素进行分析,认为语言磨蚀研究隶属于跨学科领域,其定义的重新审视可以给相关研究带来新的启示,也有助于拓宽相关研究新路向。 Judging from the research results at home and abroad,the definition of language attrition is still unsettled and its relevant theoretical analysis is also insufficient.Considering the latest developments of language attrition,this paper,firstly,pays much attention to its different existing definitions given by international researchers.Secondly,the paper re-examines its definition by analyzing its relevant affecting factors from the perspective of biology,psychology,cognitive science,general linguistics,neurolinguistics and sociolinguistics,etc.respectively.Thirdly,by doing these,the paper holds that language attrition should belong to the interdisciplinary research field.Finally,the paper aims to broaden the new research approaches of language attrition by redefining it.

作者钟守满孙崇飞

机构地区杭州师范大学外国语学院

出处《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期8-12,共5页 Foreign Language Education

基金国家社会科学基金资助项目"外语磨蚀的回归性分析"的阶段性成果(项目编号:01BYY027)

关键词语言磨蚀定义跨学科启示 language attrition definition interdisciplinary implication

分类号 H030 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献37

1Bylund,E.,Abrahamsson,N.&Hyltenstam,K.The role of lan-guage aptitude in first language attrition:The case of pre-pubescent at-triters[J].Applied Linguistics,2010,31(3):443-464.
2Cook,V.Evidence for multicompetence[J].Language Learning,1992,42(4):557-591.
3Crosson,B.,Novack,T.A.&Trenerry,M.R.Subcortical language mechanisms:Window on a new frontier[A].In H.A.Whitaker(ed.).Phonological Processes and Brain Mechanisms[C].NY:Springer,1988:24-58.
4de Bot,K.Language use as an interface between sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic processes in language attrition and language shift[A].In J.Klatter-Folmer&P.van Avermaet(eds.).Theories on Mainte-nance and Loss of Minority Languages:Towards a More Integrated Ex-planatory Framework[C].Münster/New York:Waxmann,2001:65-81.
5Fabbro,F.The Neurolinguistics of Bilingualism:An Introduction[M].London:Psychology Press,1999.
6Hansen,L.Language attrition:The fate of the start[A].In M.Mc-Groarty(ed.).Annual Review of Applied Linguistics[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001,(21):60-73.
7Hayashi,G.Language attrition of Japanese Returnee Students[J].Accents Asia,2011,4(1):20-35.Available:http://www.accentsa-sia.org/4-1/hayashi.pdf2011.
8Hulsen,M.Language Loss and Language Processing.Three Genera-tions of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand[M].Nijmegen:Katholieke Universiteit,2000.
9Kpke,B.Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition[J].Journal of Neuro-linguistics,2004a,17(1):178-195.
10Kpke,B.Attrition is not a unitary phenomenon[R].In ACTAS/PROCEEDINGS II SIMPOSIO INTERNACIONAL BILINGüISMO.Univ.Vigo,2004b:1331-1347.