摘要
目的:引进父亲在位问卷(FPQ),初步检验其在大学生群体中的信效度,建立父亲在位问卷的中文修订版(FPQ-R)。方法:方便抽取705名大学生进行FPQ测试,对其中的414名被试同时施测父母教养方式量表父亲版(PBI-F),间隔4周后对144名大一被试进行FPQ重测。采用相关系数、Cron-bachα系数、因素分析进行分量表的调整,对修订后的问卷进行信效度分析。结果:父亲在位问卷中文修订版(FPQ-R)共96个条目,包含与父亲的关系、家庭代际关系、有关父亲的信念3个高阶维度,分为8个分量表。96个条目与所在分量表的相关系数为0.43～0.83。验证性因素分析发现8因子模型的拟合指数为χ2/df=3.03,NFI=0.92,NNFI=0.94,CFI=0.94,RM SEA=0.05;3因子高阶修正模型的拟合指数为χ2/df=3.08,NFI=0.91,NNFI=0.93,CFI=0.94,RM SEA=0.06。3个高阶维度内各分量表的相关系数为0.42～0.75,3个高阶维度间各分量表的相关系数为0.18～0.45。除高阶维度二的2个分量表外,其余6个分量表与PBI-F的关爱、鼓励自主因子及总分均呈正相关(r=0.17～0.66,均P<0.01)。3个高阶维度和8个分量表的内部一致性Cronbachα系数都超过0.86,重测信度系数为0.59～0.80。结论:父亲在位问卷中文修订版具有较好的信效度,可以用于我国大学生群体。
Objective： To develop the Chinese revision of Father Presence Questionnaire （FPQ-R） and test its reliability and validity in Chinese college students. Method： Totally 705 Chinese college students were selected by convenient sampling and tested with the FPQ. Among them, 414 students were assessed with the Parental Bonding Instrument （PBI-F） at the same time. And 144 freshmen were re-tested with the FPQ after 4 weeks. The sub-scales were selected by correlation coefficient, Cronbach＇s a coefficient and factor analysis. The reliability and validity of the revised FPQ were analyzed. Results： The FPQ-R consisted of 96 items, including 3 higher-order domains, i. e., ＂relationship with the father＂, ＂intergenerational family influences＂, and ＂beliefs about the father＂, and dividing into 8 scales. The correlation coefficient of each of 96 items and its scale in the FPQ-R was 0. 43 - 0. 83. The confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） showed that the construction of the FPQ-R fit the theoretic construction of the FPQ. The fitting indices of 8-factor model were x2/df = 3. 03, NFI =0. 92, NNFI =0. 94, CFI =0. 94, and RMSEA =0. 05. The fitting indices of 3-factor adjusted model of higher-order were x2/df = 3.08, NFI = 0. 91, NNFI = 0. 93, CFI = 0. 94, and RMSEA = 0. 06. The correlation coefficients of scales within 3 higher-order domain were 0. 42 -0. 75, and the correlation coefficients of scales across higher-order domain were 0. 18 -0. 45, which means good convergent and discriininant validity. Except 2 scales in higher-order domain two, 6 scales in the FPQ-R represented significantly positive correlation with care, encouraging autonomy and the total scores in PBI-F （ r = 0. 17 - 0. 66, Ps 〈0. 01）. All Cronbach＇s a coefficients of 3 higher-order domains and 8 scales were ≥ 0. 86. The test-retest reliability coefficients were 0. 59 - 0. 80. Conclusion： The Chinese version of Father Presence Questionnaire （FPQ-R） shows good reliability and validity and could be used in Chinese college students.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第2期139-142,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金
深圳大学科研基金资助面上项目(201124)
关键词
父亲在位问卷
项目区分度
信度
效度
心理测量学研究
father presence questionnaire
item discrimination
reliability
validity
psychometrics studies
