期刊文献+

野燕麦对精噁唑禾草灵、炔草酯敏感性差异测定 被引量:13

The sensitivity of different wild oat Avena fatua populations to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and clodinafop-propargyl
原文传递
导出
摘要 为明确不同野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酯的敏感性水平,采用整株生物测定与种子生物测定分别检测了河南、湖北、江苏三省共11个野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酯的敏感性。结果表明,2种测定方法获得的野燕麦种群对2种除草剂的敏感性基本一致。整株生物测定结果显示,不同野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酸的敏感性存在显著差异,其中,金水闸野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酯敏感性最高,其GR50值(有效成分)分别为2.46、3.65 g/hm2,而辉县野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酯敏感性最低,GR50值(有效成分)分别为15.00、23.12 g/hm2,其余野燕麦种群对精噁唑禾草灵和炔草酯的敏感性介于金水闸种群与辉县种群之间。种子生物测定结果与整株生物测定结果趋势一致,但表现出的敏感性略高。 To investigate the differences in sensitivity of wild oat populations to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and clodinafop-propargyl, 11 wild oat populations were collected from Henan, Hubei, Jiangsu provinces, and whole plant and seed bioassay were employed. The result of whole plant bioassay revealed that the sensitivities of the 11 populations to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and clodinafop-propargyl were significantly different. Jinshuizha (JSZ) population was most sensitive to both herbicides, with GRs0 values (ai) of 2.46 and 3.65 g/hm^2, whereas Huixian (HX) population demonstrated lowest sensitivity to the herbicides, the GRs0 valued (ai) of 15.00 and 23.12 g/hm^2, the sensitivity of the other populations just laid in be- tween JSZ and HX. Seed bioassay showed same tendency, while with more sensitivity.
出处 《植物保护学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期87-90,共4页 Journal of Plant Protection
基金 国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2009ZX08012-025B)
关键词 野燕麦 精噁唑禾草灵 炔草酯 生物测定 敏感性 wild oat fenoxaprop-P-ethyl clodinafop-propargyl bioassay sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Christoffers M J, Berg M L, Messersmith C G. An isoleucine to leucine mutation in acetyl-CoA carboxylase confers herbicide resistance in wild oat. Genome, 2002, 45(6): 1049-1056.
  • 2王鸣华,章维华,蒋木庚.野燕麦除草剂的研究进展[J].农药,2003,42(8):6-7. 被引量:11
  • 3Délye C. Weed resistance to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors: an update. Weed Science, 2005, 53: 728-746.
  • 4Cavan G, Cussans J, Moss S. Managing the risks of herbicide resistance in wild oat. Weed Science, 2001, 49: 236-240.
  • 5Mengistu L W, Messersmith C G, Christoffers M J. Diversity of herbicide resistance among wild oat sampled 36 years apart. Weed Science, 2003, 51(5): 764-773.
  • 6杨彩宏,董立尧,李俊,杨玉清.油菜田日本看麦娘对高效氟吡甲禾灵抗药性的研究[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(12):2759-2765. 被引量:34
  • 7Brain P, Cousens R. An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Research, 1989, 29(2): 93-96.
  • 8Li R Z, Wang S W, Duan L S, et al. Genetic diversity of wild oat (Avena fatua) populations from China and the United States. Weed Science, 2007, 55(2): 95-101.
  • 9Yang C H, Dong L Y, Li J, et al. Identification of Japanese foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus) resistant to haloxyfop using three different assay techniques. Weed Science, 2007, 55(6): 537-540.
  • 10Tal A, Kotoula-Syka E, Rubin B. Seed-bioassay to detect grass weeds resistance to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides. Crop Protection, 2000, 19(7): 467-472.

二级参考文献46

  • 1刘亚光,苏少泉.快杀稗在不同环境条件下活性的研究[J].东北农业大学学报,1994,25(4):337-343. 被引量:1
  • 2黄葵.磺酰脲类除草剂在不同土壤中淋溶行为的生物测定技术[J].农药科学与管理,1995,16(1):24-26. 被引量:2
  • 3李琤,黄循一,戴育明.生物法测定土壤中甲磺隆和绿磺隆残留量[J].上海环境科学,1995,14(11):33-35. 被引量:2
  • 4.农田杂草化学防除大全[M].上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,1992.750.
  • 5[9]Julio Menendez,Rafael de Prado.Diclofop-methyl cross-resistance in a chlorotoluron-resistant biotype Alopecurus myosuroides.Pesticide Biochemistryand Physiology,1996,56:123-133.
  • 6[10]Tal A,Kotouil-Syka E,Rubin B.Seed-bioassay to detect grass weeds resistant to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibiting herbicides.Crop Protection,2000,19:467-472.
  • 7[12]Zhang X Q,Stephen B P.Resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis).Weed Science,2005,50:290-295.
  • 8[13]Volenberg D,Stoltenberg D.Altered acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confers resistance to clethodim,fluazifop and sethoxydim in Setaria faberi and Digitaria sanguinalis.Weed Research,2002,42:342-350.
  • 9Yates J. N, N - Disubstituted Amino Acid Herbicides. US:3598859.
  • 10Haddock E., Jordan D., Sampson A. J,, The Development of Flamprop- isopropyl - - A New Wild Oat Herbicide for Use in Barley. Pestic, Sci., 1975, 6: 273.

共引文献98

同被引文献168

引证文献13

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部