期刊文献+

全身麻醉在剖宫产中的临床效果分析 被引量:3

Clinical effect analysis of general anesthesia in the cesarean section
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的通过对静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉的比较,探讨剖宫产术中采用全身麻醉的临床效果。方法随机抽取在本院进行剖宫产的67例产妇,分为静吸复合麻醉组(B组33例)与全凭静脉麻醉组(A组34例),比较两组产妇术前术后的麻醉效果、并发症、不良反应及对婴儿呼吸循环的影响等。结果静吸复合麻醉组的苏醒时间明显长于全凭静脉麻醉组(P<0.01),术后躁动、恶心、呕吐的发生率也高于全凭静脉麻醉组(P<0.01)。两组患者对呼吸循环的影响差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组麻醉诱导至胎儿娩出时间及新生儿呼吸循环无明显差异。结论剖宫产术中采用全凭静脉麻醉效果好,对血流动力学的影响小,副作用小,而且可以保证新生儿安全,值得临床推广。 Objective To discuss the clinical effect of the application of general anesthesia in the cesarean section,through the comparison of combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia.Methods Sixty seven cases of lying-in women taking cesarean section in our hospital were randomly selected and divided into combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia group(group B,n = 33) and total intravenous anesthesia group(group A,n = 34).The anesthetic effects,complications,adverse reactions and the impacts on respiration and circulation of infant were compared between the two groups before and after the operation.Results The recovery time of group B was significantly longer than that of group A(P 0.01),and the occurrence rates of postoperative restlessness,nausea and vomiting were also higher than group A(P 0.01).There was no significant difference of the impact on respiratory and circulatory between the two groups(P 0.05).The difference of the time from anesthesia induction to delivery of the fetus and newborn respiratory cycle between the two groups,there was no significant.Conclusion The effect of total intravenous anesthesia used in the cesarean section is good,with fewer impacts to the hemodynamic,and the side effect is small,it can also ensure the safety of newborn,worthy of clinical application.
作者 罗辰日
出处 《中国当代医药》 2012年第3期85-86,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 剖宫产 静吸复合麻醉 全凭静脉麻醉 临床效果 Cesarean section Intravenous inhalational anesthesia Total intravenous anesthesia Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1姚允泰,龚志毅.剖宫产手术的全麻适应证和并发症[J].麻醉与监护论坛,2005,12(2):131-134. 被引量:3
  • 2庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1301.
  • 3王俊科,王多友等译.美国麻省总医院.临床麻醉手册.第5版,辽宁科学技术出版社,2007:399.
  • 4姚尚龙,吴新民.产科麻醉临床指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:95.
  • 5苑江 李学仁 张倩.不同剂量利多卡因混注减轻异丙酚注射痛的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2000,16(2):58-58.
  • 6Nathanson MH,Gajraj NM,Russell JA.Prevention of pain on injection of propofol:a comparison of lidocaine with alfentanil.Anesth Analg,1996,82:469-471.
  • 7Valtonen M,Iisalo E,Kanto J,et al.Propofol as an induction agent in children:pain on injection and pharmacokinetics.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1989,33:152-155.
  • 8Song D,Hamza M,Paul F,et al.The pharmacodynamic effects of a lower-lipid Emulsion of propofol:A comparison with the standard propofol emulsion.Anesth Analg,2004,98:687-691.
  • 9Doenicke AW,Roizen MF,Rau J,et al.Reducing pain during propofol injection:the role of the solvent.Anesth Analg,1996,82:472-474.
  • 10Ward DS,Norton JR,Guivarch PH,et al.Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of propofol in a medium-chain triglyceride emulsion.Anesthesiology,2002,97:1401-1408.

共引文献87

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部