期刊文献+

剖宫产手术中三种不同麻醉方式的临床比较 被引量:7

Caesarean Section Three Different Methods of Clinical Anesthesia Comparison
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:了解剖富产手术中单纯硬膜外麻醉(EA)、腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)和静脉麻醉(IA)的临床效果。方法:急诊剖宫产手术180例,随机分为三组,A组为单纯硬膜外麻醉,B组为腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉,C组为静脉麻醉。术中观察平均动脉压、心率、血氧饱和度,记录麻醉效果和起效时间、Bromage评分、术中、术后不良反应以及新生儿Apgar评分。结果:三组产妇在平均动脉压、心率、血氧饱和度、新生儿Apgr评分和不良反应差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),麻醉效果满意率、麻醉起效时间和Bromage评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:EA用于刨宫产手术存在麻醉诱导时间长、骶神经阻滞不完善、特别是膀胱腹膜反折处疼痛以及肌松欠佳等缺点,新生儿Apgar评分与其它两组相比略有偏低,但无统计学意义(P>0.05);IA用于剖宫产对新生儿安全无明显影响;选用CSEA较佳操作方便,麻醉平面易控制,成功率高,且费用少,可视为剖宫产术的首选麻醉方法。 Objective:Simple to understand caesarean section with epidural anesthesia (EA),spinal anesthesia-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and intravenous anesthesia (IA) of the clinical effects.Methods: 180 cases of emergency cesarean section were randomly divided into 3 groups,A group for pure epidural anesthesia,B group,spinal anesthesia-epidural anesthesia,C group intravenous anesthesia.Intraoperative mean arterial pressure,heart rate,oxygen saturation,recorded the onset time of narcotic effect and,Bromage score,intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and neonatal Apgar score.Results:Three groups were in mean arterial blood pressure,heart rate,oxygen saturation,neonatal Apgar scores and adverse reactions was no significant difference (P〉0.05),anesthesia satisfaction rate,anesthesia onset time and the Bromage score difference between the statistics significance (P 〈0.05)Conclusion:EA induction of anesthesia for cesarean section there is a long time,sacral nerve block imperfect,especially in the bladder peritoneal fold at pain,poor muscle relaxation,as well as the shortcomings of a long induction time;neonatal Apgar score,compared with the other two groups slightly low, but no statistical significance (P〉0.05),IA for the safety of cesarean section had no significant effect on the newborn;use CSEA better,convenient operation,anesthesia plane easy to control,a high success rate,and the cost less,can be regarded as the preferred cesarean section anesthesia.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2010年第7期1120-1121,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 硬膜外麻醉 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉 静脉麻醉 Epidural anesthesia Spinal anesthesia-epidural anesthesia Intravenous anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献22

  • 1鲁小红,黄醒华.剖宫产率与围产儿死亡率的关系[J].中华妇产科杂志,1994,29(8):453-455. 被引量:132
  • 2谢荣 刘亚军.我国临床应用硬膜外阻滞的调查报告[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1991,11(4):240-240.
  • 3曹泽毅.中华妇产科学(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.35-37.
  • 4曾因明.特殊病例的麻醉处理[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1983.294-296.
  • 5Brown DL, Carpenter RL, Thompson GE. Comparison of 0. 5% Ropivacaine and0. 5% Bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 1992,72:633-636.
  • 6Lyons G, macdonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for cesarean Section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1992,47:199-201.
  • 7Westbrook JL,Carrie LES. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1993, 48: 172.
  • 8Carrie LE, Donald F. A 26-gauge penNI-point needle for combined epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section[J]. Anaesthesia, 1991,46: 230-231.
  • 9Bottoms SF,Rosen MG,Sokol A.The increase in cesarean birth rate.New Engl I Med,1980,302:55-63.
  • 10Porreco R P,Thorp JA.The cesarean birth epidemic:Trends,Causes and Solutions.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1998,179:657-664.

共引文献216

同被引文献53

引证文献7

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部