期刊文献+

性病患者实行就医实名制的利弊及其对策探讨 被引量:4

Analysis of the pros and cons of and responses to implementing real-name STD case reporting
原文传递
导出
摘要 自从20世纪70年代末性病在我国重新流行以来,性病的流行已经成我国重要的公共卫生和社会问题,而且成为艾滋病流行的重要因素。为了加强性病传染源的控制和管理,国务院法制办于2011年5月公布了《性病防治管理办法(修订征求意见稿)》,该意见稿中正式提出性病报告实行实名制。这项举措带来了对性病患者隐私权的强烈冲击,引起了学术界乃至社会各界的广泛争议。作者针对性病患者的求医行为特点、实行就医实名制的利弊,探讨如何在医疗活动中平衡社会知情权和患者个人隐私权的冲突,如何在保障个人、医疗机构和大众等权利主体的合法利益不受侵犯的前提下,逐步实行性病患者的就医实名制。 Since the resurgence of STD in the late 1970s in China, the epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), a critical co-factor of AIDS, has became one of the most important public health and social problems. In order to strengthen the management and control of source of infection of STDs, the State Council Legislative Affairs Office announced" the Regulation of STD Prevention and Control ( Revised Draft )" in May 2011, which formally proposed implementing a real-name STD case reporting system. The proposal has brought strong impact on the privacy of STD patients, which has aroused widespread controversies in the academic circles as well as in all sectors of society. Taking consideration into the characteristics of STD patients and the pros and cons of implementing real-name case reporting, the author discussed how to balance the conflict between the public's right to know and patients' privacy in medical activities, how to carry out seeking STD care with real-name system progressively in terms of protecting the legitimate interests of individuals, medical institutions and the general public.
出处 《中国艾滋病性病》 CAS 2011年第6期683-685,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aids & STD
关键词 性病 实名制 隐私权 STDs Real name system Privacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献3

共引文献4

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部