期刊文献+

本体感觉定量评定的可靠性初探 被引量:29

A preliminary study of test reliabilty in quantitative proprioeeption measurement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究Tecnobody康复系统定量评定本体感觉的可靠性。方法健康人9例,其中男4例,女5例,年龄(22.8±0.68)岁,用Tecnobody按系统要求连续评定双足本体感觉3次。用重复测量标准误、简单相关系数、组内相关系数分析每次的耗时(Time)和平均轨迹差(ATE)。结果Time重复测量标准误左右分别为3.07-3.83和6.65-8.44,ATE左右分别为1.33-1.97和1.39-1.91;Time简单相关系数左右分别为0.919和0.62,ATE左右分别为0.808和0.831;Time组内相关系数左右分别为0.893和0.639,ATE左右分别为0.716和0.734。结论该系统具备较好的可靠性,且评估不必重复多次,但其各参数设置及中国人标准参考值范围仍需进一步探究。 Objective To study the test-retest reliability in quantitative measurement of proprioception using Tecnobody rehabilitation system. Methods Nine healthy volunteers [4 males, 5 females, averaged age (22.8 ±0.68) years] participated in three consecutive measurements on both feet by using Tecnobody rehabilitation system for computerized proprioeeptive assessment. Standard elTor of measurement ( SEM ) , correlation coefficient and intra- class correlation coefficient(ICC) obtained from the three consecutive measurements were used to analyze the "Time" used in each measuring session, and the "average track error" (ATE) of the measurements. Results SEM values of "Time" in left foot and right foot were 3.07 - 3.83 and 6.65 - 8.44 respectively. ATE values in left foot and right foot were 1.33 - 1.97 and 1.39 -1.91 respectively. The "Time" and ATE correlation coefficients of left foot / right foot were 0. 919/0.6 and 0. 808/0. 831, l'espectively. The "Time" ICC values were 0. 893/0. 639 for left foot / right foot, respectively ; and the "ATE" ICC values were 0. 716/0. 734 for left foot / right foot, respectively. Conclusion The Tecnobody rehabilitation system provided a fairly good reliability in both " relative" and " absolute" values in quantitative evaluation of proprioception in the feet. These data in a larger amount may be useful for setting up varia bles and the standard values of the local population for reference in proprioceptive rehabilitation.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期34-37,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 本体感觉 定量评估 可靠性 平均轨迹差 Proprioception Quantitative assessment Reliability Average track error
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jancove J. Measure the balance control system review. Acta Medica, 2008,51 :129-137.
  • 2Thomas M, Thomas R. Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions-a conceptual model. Brain Res Rev, 1998,28:118-135.
  • 3Prosperini L,Leonardi L,de Cadi P ,et al. Visuo-proprioceptive training reduces risk of falls in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler , 2010,16 :491-499.
  • 4Mohammadi F. Comparison of 3 preventive methods to reduce the recurrence of ankle inversion sprains in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med,2007,35:922-926.
  • 5Ageberg E, Flenhagen J, Ljung J. Test-retest reliability of knee kinesthesia in healthy adults. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ,2007,8 :57.
  • 6Boerhoom AL, Huizinga MR, Kaan W A, et al. Validation of a method to measure the proprioception of the knee. Gait Posture ,2008 ,28 :610- 614.
  • 7Felicetti G, Chiappano G, Molino A, et al. Preliminary study on the validity of an instrumental method of evaluating proprioception in patients undergoning total knee arthroplasty. Eur Med Phys, 2003,39: 87-94.
  • 8Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999 :337.
  • 9Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rebabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2005 ,84 :719-723.
  • 10Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Assessing intrarater, interrater and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. Stat Med, 2002,21 : 3431-3446.

二级参考文献19

  • 1马燕红,程安龙,白跃宏,江澜,李韵,袁伟芳,沈晓艳,蒋垚,赵金忠.膝前交叉韧带重建术后本体感觉促进训练对膝关节位置觉的影响[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(10):16-17. 被引量:24
  • 2Goble DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice[J]. Phys Ther, 2010,90(8): 1176-1184.
  • 3Li JX, Xu DQ, Hong Y. Effects of 16-week Tai Chi interven- tion on postural stability and proprioception of knee and an- kle in older people[J]. Age Ageing,2008,37(5):575-578.
  • 4Lira EC, Tan MH. Side-to-side diftrence in joint position sense and kinesthesia in unilateral functional ankle instability [J]. Foot Ankle Int,2009,30(10):1011-1017.
  • 5Schmitt H, Kuni B, Sabo D. Influence of professional dance training on peak torque and proprioception at the ankle[J]. Clin J Sport Med,2005,15(5):331-339.
  • 6Willems T, Witvrouw E, Verstuyft J,et al. Preprioception and Muscle Strength in Subjects With a History of Ankle Sprains and Chronic Instability[J]. 3 Athl Train,2002,37(4):487-493.
  • 7Akiyama K, Takakura Y, Tomita Y, et el. Neurohistology of the sinus tarsi and sinus tarsi syndrome[J]. J Orthop Sci, 1999,4(4):299-303.
  • 8Konradsen L, Ravn JB, Scrensen AI. Propriuception at the ankle: the effect of anaesthetic blockade of ligament receptors [J]. Bone .loint Surz Br.1993.75(3):433-436.
  • 9Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Wenderoth N, et al. Proprioceptive sen- sibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2009,33(3):271-278.
  • 10Goble DJ, Brown SH. Upper limb asymmetries in the match- ing of proprioceptive versus visual targets[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2008,99(6):3063-3074.

共引文献19

同被引文献300

引证文献29

二级引证文献420

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部