数学教学的三种水平及其理论分析被引量：36

Theoretical Analysis on Three Levels of Mathematics Teaching

下载PDF

导出

摘要数学教学分为基本型教学、智慧型教学、创新型教学三个层次，三个层次分别依托数学教师的基本知识结构、学科教学能力（PCA）、创新能力。三个层次的教学即三种水平的教学，表现出自身相对独立的个性和特点，在教学理念、教学操作等方面存在差异。从基本型教学走向智慧型教学再走向创新型教学，是数学教学的应然追求。 Mathematics teaching can be divided into elementary level, intelligent level, and innovative level, corresponding to mathematics teachers＇ differences on fundamental knowledge structure, pedagogical content ability （PCA） and innovation capability. The three levels are characterized distinctly and briefly, and distinguished with one another about teaching ideas, behaviors, etc. A math teacher in his career ought to proceed from the pursuit of elementary level to that of intelligent level and even to innovative level.

作者喻平

机构地区南京师范大学数学科学学院

出处《课程·教材·教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期63-69,共7页 Curriculum，Teaching Material and Method

基金全国教育科学“十一五”规划重点课题:中国数学教育研究30年(DAA080080)

关键词数学教学层次知识结构 PCA 创新能力 levels of mathematis teaching knowledge structure PCA innovative capability

分类号 G633.6 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献8

1杨翠蓉,胡谊,吴庆麟.教师知识的研究综述[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1167-1169. 被引量：45
2Shulman LS. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform [J]. Harvard Eudcational Review, 1987, 57 (1): 1-22.
3Grossman P L. The Making of A Teacher : Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education [M]. New York: Teachers College Press, 1990: 7-9.
4邵瑞珍.教育心理学[M].上海：上海教育出版社,1997..
5李渺,喻平,唐剑岚,黄晓学.高中数学教师知识结构的特征研究[J].数学教育学报,2007,16(2):55-59. 被引量：23
6Cochran K F, James A DeRuiter, Richard A King. Pedagogical Content Knowing.. An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation [J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 1993, 44 (4), 263-272.
7Schommer M, Explaining the Epistemological Belief System: Introducing the Embedded Systemic Model and Coordinated Research Approach[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2004, 39 (1): 19-29.
8杨启亮.教师学科专业发展的几个层次[J].教育发展研究,2009,29(15):45-48. 被引量：16

二级参考文献21

1D C. Cruiekshank. J. Kennedy, Teacher Behaviors Related to Student Achievement on a Social Science Concept Test. Journal of Teacher Education, 1977,2 : 52 - 63.
2D C. Cruickshank, J. Kennedy. An Empirical Investigation of Teacher Clarity. Jouranl of Teacher Education, 1977,3:53- 63.
3T L. Good, D A. Group. Teaching Effects: A Process - Product Study in Fourth - Grade Mathematics Classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 1977,3:49 - 65.
4B. R. Joyce. Research into the Teaching Mind: A vital direction,Educational Research Quarterly, 1979,3(4) : 10 - 15.
5K. Carter, Berliner, D. C etc. Expert - Novice Differences in Perceiving and Processing Visual Classroom Information. Journal of Teacher Education, 1988,39(3) :25 - 31.
6J. L. Fogarty, M. C. Wang, R. Creek. A descriptive study of experienced and novice teachers' instructional thoughts and actions.Journal of Educational Research, 1983,77 ( 1 ) :22 - 32.
7L.S. Shulman. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Research, 1987, 57( 1 ) : 1 - 22.
8Grossman, P. L. Teachers' Knowledge. In: Anderson, L. W.International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (2nd ed. ). UK. Cambridge University, Cambuidge, 1995 : 20 - 24.
9Weinert, F. E, Heimke, Schrader, F. W. Research on the Model Teacher and tile Teaching Model Effective In F. K. Oser and A.Dicker. Effective and Responsible Teaching:The New Synthesis. San Franciso. Jossey - Bass Publishers, 1992 : 251 - 253.
10Hilda Borko, Ralph T. Putnam. Learning to teach. In: R.Calfee&D. 13erliner . Handbook of Education Psychology. New York : Macmillan Library Reference , 1996 : 673 - 708.