期刊文献+

Ⅱ类骨质平台转换连接种植体植入深度对皮质骨应力的影响 被引量:1

Effect of different implant depth on stress distribution of cortical bone in type Ⅱ bone area using platform switching
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究Ⅱ类骨质平台转换连接种植体不同植入深度对皮质骨应力的影响。方法于2010年3月在滨州医学院(烟台校区)参照Ankylos种植系统种植体和实心基台的真实数据,利用Solidworks2007制图软件,模拟不同植入深度时平台转换连接种植体-基台-Ⅱ类骨质模型,导入Ansys workbench有限元软件,采用垂直向200N和斜向100N加载,分析不同植入深度时的应力分布。结果不同植入深度间皮质骨最大应力差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);当植入深度在皮质骨下2mm范围内时皮质骨最大应力在各向加载时均较稳定。结论为避免应力在骨组织中的过度集中,Ⅱ类骨质植入深度应控制在皮质骨下2mm范围内。 Objective To study the effect of different implant depth on stress distribution of cortical bone in type Ⅱ bone area using platform switching. Methods Using Solidworks2007 mapping software, we established the model of implant-abutment in type Ⅱ bone area with different implant depth. The model was loaded vertically and 45-degree from the abutment using Ansys-workbenchl 1.0 finite element analysis software. Then we analyzed the stress distribution on conditions of different implant depth. Results The difference of the maximum stress of cortical bone in different im- plant depth was very significant (P 〈 0.01). When the implant depth was within 2ram in cortical bone, the maximum stress of cortical bone was suitable. Conclusion To avoid the excessive stress concentration on the bone, the implant depth should be controlled within less than 2 mm under the cortical bone.
机构地区 烟台市口腔医院
出处 《中国实用口腔科杂志》 CAS 2011年第11期668-670,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 种植体 平台转换 应力分布 皮质骨 implant platform switching stress distribution cortical bone
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lazzara R J, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new conceptin implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006,26( 1 ) :9 - 17.
  • 2Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, et al. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation : initial observations and case report[J]. Pract Proced Aesthe Dent ,2005,17(10) :735-740.
  • 3Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation [M]// Braemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985 : 199 - 209.
  • 4Eriko K, Roxana S, Shuichi N, et al. Bio-mechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointe-grated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants, 2004,15(3) :401 - 412.
  • 5Mellal A, Wiskott HW, Botsis J, et al. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data [ J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004,15(2) :239 - 248.
  • 6Cochran DL. The scientific basis for clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI dental implant system: a consensus report [J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2000, 11 (1) :33 - 58.
  • 7Hojjatie B, Anusavice KS. Three dimensional finite element analyses of glass ceramic dental crowns [J ]. J Biomechanics, 1990, 23 (11):1157- 1166.
  • 8Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads:a methodologic clinical study [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2002,15 ( 1 ) : 20 - 27.

同被引文献15

  • 1张辉,邓飞龙,陈卓凡,罗智斌,魏少金.谐振频率法分析骨挤压术对种植体初期稳定性的影响[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2009,14(2):49-53. 被引量:7
  • 2Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, et al. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod, Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(1): 30-37.
  • 3Li T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a threedimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 38(10): 1077-1083.
  • 4Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26 (1): 9- 17.
  • 5Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2001, 16(4): 475-485.
  • 6Maeda Yoshinobu, Miura Jiro, Taki Ikuro, et al. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rational. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(5): 581-584.
  • 7Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. Braemark PI, Zarb GA,Albrektsson T. Tissue-Integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1987: 199-209.
  • 8Jeong Mi-Ae, Kim Su-Gwan, Kim Young-Kyun, et al. A multicenter prospective study in type 1V bone of a single type of implant. Implant Dent, 2012, 21(4): 330-334.
  • 9A1-M aseeh J, Levin B, Sym eon ides E. The osteotom e technique: a classification for technique app roach and clinical case reports. Compend Cant in Edue Dent, 2005, 26(8): 551-556.
  • 10Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants:considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15(4): 401- 412.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部