期刊文献+

内皮祖细胞在大鼠外伤性视神经损伤中作用的研究 被引量:3

Role of endothelial progenitor cells in optic nerve injury of rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨内皮祖细胞(EPC)在大鼠外伤性视神经损伤中的作用。方法实验研究。采用液压冲击颅脑损伤仪制作外伤性视神经损伤动物模型,108只大鼠(108只眼)采用随机数字表法随机分为视神经损伤组和假手术对照组,每组54只;两组按照损伤前24h及损伤后3、12、24、48、72h…123周时间点随机分为9个亚组,每个亚组6只。测定各组上述时间点外周血EPC数量并观察视神经HE染色、血管内皮标志物CD31免疫组织化学染色及闪光视觉诱发电位(F—VEP)变化。视神经损伤组与假手术对照组同一时间点的比较采用独立样本t检验;不同检测项目间的相关性分析采用Pearson积差相关检验。结果正常大鼠外周血EPC数量为(46—52)+/200000单个核细胞,大鼠外伤性视神经损伤后3、12、24、48.72h及1、2、3周外周血EPC计数分别为(34±4、34±5、69±9、76±6、107±9、69±7、58±6、56±4)+/200000单个核细胞,视神经损伤组与假手术对照组比较,3、12、24、48、72h、1、2周时间点差异有统计学意义(t=5.29,2.90,-4.30,-7.61,~14.17,-5.74,-2.79;P〈0.05)。正常大鼠视神经及周围组织CD3+细胞数为(7~9)+/5个高倍视野,视神经损伤后创伤区CD31’细胞计数分别为(8.36±1.52、7.17±1.10、10.41±1.92、11.43±1.58、14.29±2.03、17.33±1.47、17.86±1.22、18.13±1.40)/5个高倍视野,视神经损伤组与假手术对照组比较,48、72h…123周时间点差异均有统计学意义(t=4.31,-7.61,-8.17,-10.08,-10.79;P〈0.05)。正常大鼠视神经及周围组织微血管数量为(6—9)个/5个高倍视野,视神经损伤后损伤区微血管数量分别为(7.54±2.01、8.52±2.21、11.02±1.62、15.40±2.04、18.39±1.96、23.21±1.50、22.78±2.40、24.13±2.51)个/5个高倍视野,视神经损伤组与假手术对照组比较,48、72h…123周时间点差异均有统计学意义(t=4.25,-7.74,-8.26,-10.28,-11.49;P〈0.05)。视神经损伤后F-VEP中P波潜伏期于损伤后3h降低,24h反弹增高到正常水平以上,并趋于稳定,视神经损伤组与假手术对照组相比,3、12、24、48、72h…123周差异均有统计学意义(t=4.15,3.74,5.84,6.08,6.40,6.52,6.53,6.61;P〈0.05);F—VEP中振幅于3h降低,12h升高到接近基础水平,24h后逐渐降低至基础水平以下,实验组与对照组比较,3、24、48、72h、1、2、3周差异有统计学意义(t=3.95,4.14,5.26,5.78,6.49,6.72,6.23;P〈0.05)。外周血EPC数量变化与创伤区周围CD31’细胞、微血管及F—VEP变化存在相关性(r=0.43,0.41,0.43;P〈0.01)。结论外伤性视神经损伤后外周血内皮祖细胞明显增加,归巢到创伤区,参与了创伤区血管新生和组织损伤修复。 Objective To investigate the role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in the injury of rat optic nerve. Methods An experimental study. The rat model of optic nerve injury was created by fluid percussion brain injury device (FPI). On hundred and eight rats (108 eyes) were divided into 2 groups randomly. Each group was further divided into 9 subgroups by the time of injury (24 h before and 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h, 1, 2 and 3 weeks after the injury). The number of circulating EPCs was measured, HE staining of the optic nerve, immunohistochemistry study of CD31 ( markers of vascular endothelial cells) and flash-visual evoked potential (F-VEP) were observed at every time point. Two independent sample t-test was used for the comparison between the control group and the optic nerve injury groups at the same time point. The correlation between different items was analyzed by Pearson test. P value less than 0. 05 was considered significant. Results The number of EPCs in normal rats was 46 - 52/200 000 monocytes. After traumatic optic nerve injury, the number of EPCs was (34 ±4, 34 ±5, 69±, 76 ±6, 107 ±9, 69 ±7, 58 ±6 and 56 ±)/200 000 monocytes at 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h, and 1, 2 and 3 weeks. The difference of number of EPCs between the experiment and control groups was significant at 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h and 1 and 2 weeks after the injury (t =5.29,2. 90, -4. 30, -7.61, - 14. 17, -5.74 and -2.79;P 〈0. 05). The number of CD31 cell in the optic nerve and surround tissues in normal rats was (7 -9)/5 high magnification field. After the injury, the number of CD31 ceil was 8.36 ± 1.52, 7.17 ± 1.10, 10.41 ±1.92, 11.43 ±1.58, 14. 29 ±. 03, 17.33 ±1.47, 17.86 ± 1.22 and 18. 13 ±1.40 at different time points. The difference of number of CD31 cell between the experiment and control groups was significant at 48, 72 h, and 1,2, and 3 weeks after the injury (t =4. 31, - 7.61, - 8. 17, - 10. 08, and - 10. 79 ;P 〈 0. 05). The number of microvessels in the optic nerve and surround tissues in normal rats was 6 -9/ 5 high magnification field. After traumatic optic nerve injury, the number of microvessels was 7. 54 ±2.01, 8.52 ±2.21, 11.02 ± 1.62, 15.40 ± 2. 04, 18. 39 ± 1.96, 23.21 ±1.50, 22.78 ^- 2. 40 and 24. 13 ±2. 51 at different time points. The difference of number of microvessels between the experiment and control groups was significant at 48, 72 h, 1, 2, and 3 weeks after the injury (t = 4. 25, - 7. 74, - 8.26, - 10. 28 and - 11.49;P 〈 0. 05 ). The latency period of P waves was decreased at 3 h and increased to above basic level at 24 h, and then tend to be stable. The difference of latency period of P waves between the experiment and control groups was significant at 3, 12, 24, 48, 72 h, 1, 2 and 3 weeks after the injury (t = 4. 15, 3.74, 5.84, 6.08, 6. 40, 6. 52, 6. 53 and 6.61 ;P 〈 0. 05 ). The amplitude of F-VEP was decreased at 3 h and increased to the basic level at 12 h, then decreased to below the basic level gradually. The difference of the amplitude of F- VEP between the experiment and control groups was significant at 3, 24, 48, 72 h, 1, 2 and 3 weeks after the injury (t=3.95, 4. 14, 5.26, 5.78, 6. 49, 6.72 and 6.23;P〈0.05). The number of EPCs was correlated with the number of CD31 ~ cell, mierovessels and F-VEP ( r = 0. 43, 0. 41 and 0. 43 ; P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions The present study showed that the number of EPCs in the blood increases significantly after traumatic optic nerve injury, and the cells can arrive the traumatic area to repair injured tissue and enhance angiogenesis.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1089-1095,共7页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金资助(2010KZ109)
关键词 视神经损伤 内皮细胞 干细胞 流式细胞术 大鼠 Optic nerve injuries Endothelial cells Stem cells Flow cytometry Rats
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1曹文捷,施彩虹.视神经损伤细胞凋亡与神经保护的实验研究进展[J].医学综述,2006,12(5):276-278. 被引量:9
  • 2Callaghan M J,Ceradini DJ,Gurtner GC.Hyperglycemia-induced reactive oxygen species and impaired endothelial progenitor cell function.Antioxid Redox Signal,2005,7:1476-1482.
  • 3张琳琳,吕瀛娟,于荣国,王兴,申战省,张蔚,颜华.标准化大鼠外伤性视神经损伤动物模型建立[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2008,30(12):913-917. 被引量:21
  • 4Weidner N,Semple JP,WelchWR,et al.Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breastcarcinoma.N Engl J Med,1991,324:1-8.
  • 5Wang BH,Robertson BC,Girotto JA,et al.Traumatic optic neuropathy:a review of 61 patients.Plast Reconstr Strg,2001,107:1655-1664.
  • 6Cook MW,Levin LA,Joseph MP,et al.Traumatic optic neuropathy.a meta-analysis.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1996,122:389-392.
  • 7Hristov M,Erl W,Weber PC.Endothelial progenitor cells:mobilization,differentiation,and homing.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Bio1,2003,23:1185-1189.
  • 8Asahara T,Murohara T,Sullivan A,et al.Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis.Science,1997,275:964-967.
  • 9de la Taille A,Katz AE,Bagiella E,et al.Microvessel density as a predictor of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Acomparison of CD34 and CD31.Am J Clin Pathol,2000,113:555-562.
  • 10Pavlakis K,Messini I,Vrekoussis T,et al.The assessment of angiogenesis and fibroblastic stromagenesis in hyperplastic and preinvasive breast lesions.BMC Cancer,2008,8:88.

二级参考文献46

  • 1苏颖,王继群,王峰,山艳春,陈剑,崔浩,徐锦堂.定量大鼠视神经损伤模型的建立[J].中国病理生理杂志,2005,21(6):1242-1245. 被引量:11
  • 2邹倩,叶剑,冯联兵.大鼠视神经损伤致视网膜病变的病理形态学定量分析[J].实用医药杂志,2005,22(6):526-528. 被引量:3
  • 3Jafari SS, Maxwell WL, Neilson M, et al. Axonal cytoskeletal changes after non - disruptive axonal injury [ J]. Neurocytol, 1997,26 (2) :207 -221.
  • 4Klocker N, Zerfowski M, Gellrich NC, et al. Morphological and functional analysis of an incomplete CNS fiber tract lesion : graded crush of the rat optic nerve [ J ]. Neurosci Methods, 2001,110 ( 1 - 2 ) : 147 - 153.
  • 5Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Zerfowski M, et al. Quantification of histological changes after calibrated crush of the intraorbital optic nerve in rats [ J ]. Br J Ophthalmol,2002,86 (2) :233 - 237.
  • 6Hilaire JT, Jonathan L, Niklas M, et al. Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15 -year review and evaluation [ J ]. J Neurotrauma, 2005,22( 1 ) :42 -47.
  • 7Holmes MD, Sires BS. Flash visual evoked potentials predict visual outcome in traumatic optic neuropathy [ J ]. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,2004,20(5 ) :342 - 346.
  • 8Takehara S, Tanaka T, Uemura K, et al. Optic nerve injury demonstrated by MRI with STIR sequences [ J ]. Neuroradiology, 1994,36 (4) :512 -514.
  • 9Horton JC, Hoyt WF, Foreman DS, et al. Confirmation by magnetic resonance imaging of optic nerve injury after retrobulbar anesthesia [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1996,114 (3) :351 - 353.
  • 10Foerster AP, Holmes MJ. Spontaneous regeneration of severed optic axons restores mapped visual responses to the adult rat superior colliculus [J]. Eur J Neurosci,1999,11 (9) :3151 -3166.

共引文献34

同被引文献57

  • 1刘兰涛,夏峰,范馨燕,郭群,张磊,张作明.植入电极记录豚鼠图形视觉诱发电位[J].眼视光学杂志,2008,10(6):429-434. 被引量:4
  • 2刘庆淮,谢平,戈应滨,袁孝如.一氧化氮及其合酶在糖尿病视网膜损伤中的作用[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(9):837-841. 被引量:18
  • 3Hammes HP, Feng Y, Pfister F, et al. Diabetic retinopathy targeting vasoregression. Diabetes, 2011,60 9-16.
  • 4Asahara T, Kawamoto A. Endothelial progenitor cells for postnatal vasculogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2004, 287~ 572-579.
  • 5Bhatwadekar AD, Glenn JV, Li G, et al. Advanced glycation of fihronectin impairs vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells: implications for vasodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008,49 : 1232-1241.
  • 6Gmez-Cerezo JF, Pagdn-Munoz B, L6pez-Rodriguez M, et al. The role of endothelial progenitor cells and statins in endothelial function: a review. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem, 2007,5 : 265-272.
  • 7Navaratna D, McGuire PG, Menicucci G, et al. Proteolytic degradation of VE-cadherin alters the blood-retinal barrier in diabetes. Diabetes, 2007,56 : 2380-2387.
  • 8Barber AJ, Gardner TW, Abcouwer SF. The significance of vascular and neural apoptosis to the pathology of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2011,52:1156-1163.
  • 9Ii M. Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor ceils: isolation and characterization for myocardial repair. Methods Mol Biol, 2010,660:9-27.
  • 10Hristov M, Erl R, Weber PC mobilization, differentiation, and Vase Biol, 2003,23 : 1185-1189.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部