期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

应用股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋(髁)螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的对比分析 被引量：8

A comparative analysis of dynamic hip/condylar screw and proximal femoral nailing antirotation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]比较应用股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)与动力髋(髁)螺钉(DHS/DCS)治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。[方法]应用股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)治疗老年股骨转子间骨折患者49例,应用动力髋(髁)螺钉(DHS/DCS)患者62例,分别对术中出血量、手术时间、术中和术后并发症、术后髋关节功能评分进行比较分析。[结果]DHS组手术方式出血量显著高于PFNA组(P<0.05),术后并发症显著少于DHS/DCS组(P<0.05),髋关节功能(Harris评分)优良率显著高于DHS/DCS组(P<0.05)。[结论]多数情况下,股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)在治疗老年股骨转子间骨折时较动力髋(髁)螺钉(DHS/DCS)具有显著优势。 [Objective]To compare the clinical effects of dynamic hip/condylar screw（DHS/DCS）and proximal femoral nailing antirotation（PFNA） for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. [Method]Forty-nine elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated using proximal femoral nailing antirotation,and 62 were treated using dynamic hip/condylar screw.The data of each group were recorded,and blood loss,operation time,total complications and postoperative Harris scores for hip joint were analyzed. [Result]The blood loss,total complications and postoperative Harris scores for hip joint were of statistical significance（P〈0.05）.In comparing with DHS/DCS group,PFNA group was of less blood loss and less operative was complications.The postoperative Harris scores for hip joint of PFNA group was more satisfactory. [Conclusion]In most cases,proximal femoral nailing antirotation is clearly superior to dynamic hip/condylar screw for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.
作者 梁春雨 张柳 平少华 白俊清 冯林杰 王宇
机构地区 河北联合大学附属医院骨科
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第24期2038-2040,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 股骨转子间骨折 股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉 髋动力螺钉 动力髁螺钉 intertrochanteric fracture proximal femoral nailing antirotation dynamic hip screw dynamic condylar screw
分类号 R687.3 [医药卫生—骨科学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1鲁英,罗先正.203例股骨粗隆间骨折治疗分析[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1991,6(1):7-9. 被引量：343
  • 2姜保国,张殿英,付中国.股骨近端骨折的治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(5):484-487. 被引量：189
  • 3Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture : a biomechanical evaluation [ J ]. Injury,2006,10:984 - 989.
  • 4郑红根,唐昊,张秋林.两种不同内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(6):407-410. 被引量：82
  • 5Parker M J, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults [ J ]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 4: CD000093.
  • 6Crawford CH, Malkani AL, Cordray S, et al. The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures : a review of 93 cases[ J]. Trauma,2006,2:325.
  • 7Lenich A, Fierlbeck J, Al-Munajjed A, et al. First clinical and biomechanical results of the trochanteric fixation nail [ J ]. Technol Health Care ,2006,4:403 - 409.
  • 8Klinger HM, Baums MH, Eckert M, et al. A comparative study of unstable and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and trochanteric but press plate vs. proximal femoral nail (PFNA) [ J]. Zentralbl Chir,2005,4:301.
  • 9Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Ruter A. Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures dynamic hip screw ( DHS ) with trochanterie stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFNA) [ J ]. Unfallchirurg, 2003,1:39.
  • 10章暐,邹剑,罗从风,张长青.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间及转子下骨折的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):649-652. 被引量：182

二级参考文献49

共引文献951

同被引文献78

  • 1徐瑞生,吴洁石,薛骏,包聚良,王立邦.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败后的假体置换治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(6):416-418. 被引量：16
  • 2陈德喜,万修阳,郎继孝,李巍,刘玉江,赵景明,王博,李沂红,邢其英.高龄股骨粗隆间不稳定型骨折不同手术方式比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(6):431-433. 被引量：58
  • 3Wong TC, Chiu Y, Tsang WL, et al. A double-blind, pro- spective,randomised, controlled clinical trial of minimally invasive dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric {ractures[J]. Injury,2009,40(4) : 422-427.
  • 4Konstantinidis L, Papaioannou C, Mehlhorn A, et al. Sal- vage procedures for trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure: biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylar screw[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H,2011,225(7) 710-717.
  • 5Roerdink WH, Aalsma AM, Nijenbanning G, et al. The dynamic locking blade plate, a new implant for intracap- sular hip fractures: biomechanical comparison with the sliding hip screw and Twin Hook[J]. Injury, 2009,40 (3) 283-287.
  • 6Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily prac- tice: results of a multicentre clinical study [J]. Injury, 2008,39(8) : 932-939.
  • 7Saarenpa I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, et al. Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma loc- king nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients[J]. Int Orthop, 2009, 33 (1) : 255-260.
  • 8Ma CH,Tu YK, Yu SW, et al. Reverse LISS plates for unstable proximal femoral fractures [J]. Injury, 2010,41 (8) : 827-833.
  • 9Acklin YP, Bereiter H, Sommer C. Reversed LISS-DF in selected cases of complex proximal femur fractures[J]. Injury,2010,41(4) : 427-429.
  • 10Uzun M, ErtOrer E, OztiJrk I, et al. Long-term radio- graphic complications following treatment of unstable in- tertrochanteric femoral fractures with the proximal femo- ral nail and effects on functional results[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2009,43(6) : 457-463.

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

中国矫形外科杂志
2011年 第24期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部