摘要
20世纪六七十年代进行的三线建设,虽已过去几十年了,但对它的评价依然存在颇多争议。对三线建设作出分析评价,确非易事,很大程度上归因于其特殊性。有鉴于此,有必要提出三线建设二重性这一命题,即它既是旨在应对战争危险的特殊政治行为,又是谋求改善生产力布局的一般经济行为。由于战争没有绝对确实性,只有相对确实性,因此政府的经济行为并不总是取决于经济学原则,还要考虑社会政治的要求。与此同时,评价三线建设得失时,还要面对其经济分析的特殊因素和难以避免的模糊性。总之,三线建设得失相比,得是长期起作用的因素,是国家战略利益所系;失是得的必要代价,从根本上说是外部敌对势力强加给中国人的,也是暂时的,终归会得到补偿。
The evaluation of third-line construction still remained controversial though past for few decades. Analyzing and evaluating third-line construction was indeed not an easy task, which largely attributed to its particularity. In view of that, it was necessary to put forward the duality of third-line construction. It was not only the special political act towards war danger, but also the general economic behavior to improve the layout of productivity. Because there was no absolute certainty, but only relative certainty, the government's economic behavior could not always depend on the principles of economics, but should consider social and political demands. Meanwhile, when evaluating the gain and loss of third-line construction, we should face the particularity of economic analysis and ambiguity difficult to avoid. In short, the gain and loss of the third-line construction was related with the national strategic interests. The loss was the necessary price of the gain. Fundamentally speaking, the loss was imposed on the Chinese people by the hostile external forces, temporary, and would be compensated.
出处
《当代中国史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期63-70,127,共8页
Contemporary China History Studies
