期刊文献+

论转喻回指中的常规关系因素

On Conventionality Factors in Metonymic Anaphora
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 无论是指称转喻还是转喻回指,常规关系都扮演着极为重要的角色。指称转喻中的常规关系存在于源域与目标域之间,而转喻回指中的常规关系则存在于回指语与指称转喻的源域和/或目标域之间。常规关系的存在与否,强度的大与小,能够在很大程度上制约回指语类型的选择,而通过使用模糊常规所指或加强语境的手段也能保证非常规关系情况下回指关系的建立。 Conventionality plays rather important roles in both referential metonymy and metonymic anaphora. In referential metonymy, conventional relations exist between source domain and target domain, while in metonymic anaphora this kind of relationship exists between anaphor and the source or/and target domain (s). The presence or absence of conventionality and its intensity can to a large extent determine the choice of a certain kind of anaphor. When non-conventional relation is involved, the establishment of anaphorie relation can also be ensured by means of blurting the conventional reference or intensifying certain contexts.
作者 王劼
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 2011年第4期35-39,共5页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 江苏省普通高校博士生科研创新计划(人文社科类)"模糊回指的语篇功能研究"(CXZZ11-0077)的阶段性成果
关键词 指称转喻 回指 常规关系 referential metonymy anaphora conventionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1AI-Sharafi, A. Textual Metonymy--A Semiotic Approach [ M ]. Chipp- enham and Eastbourne: Antony Rowe Ltd, 2004.
  • 2Ariel, M. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents [ M ]. London : Rout- ledge, 1990.
  • 3Barcelona, A. Introduction: The cognitive theory of metaphor and me- tonymy[ A]. In Barcelona, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at theCrossroads[ C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000: 1-28.
  • 4Barnden, J. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery [ J ]. Cognitive Linguist,s,2010,21 ( 2 ) : 1-34.
  • 5Chen, P. Referential Introducing and Tracking in Chinese Narratives [ D]. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA,1956.
  • 6Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding[ M ]. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1981.
  • 7Gibbs, R. W. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought Language and Understanding[ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 8Giora, R. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis[ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1997 ( 83 ) : 183-206.
  • 9Gundel, J. K. , Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse [ J ]. Language, 1993,69 (2) : 274-307.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. Cohesion in English [ M ]. Lon- don: Longman, 1976.

二级参考文献186

共引文献209

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部