期刊文献+

中国战略性新兴产业创新效率的实证分析 被引量:77

Empirical Study on the Innovation Efficiency of Strategic Emerging Industries in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文首先利用SFA模型测算了我国战略性新兴产业的创新效率,然后通过面板To-bit模型分析了企业规模和不同的创新方式对产业创新效率的影响路径,以及不同产权结构对创新效率的影响程度。研究发现,我国战略性新兴产业创新效率水平整体上较低,企业规模与创新效率呈倒U型的非线性关系,自主创新和技术引进对创新效率的影响比较显著,而技术改造和消化吸收对创新效率的影响并不显著。不同的产权结构对创新效率的影响并不相同,国有产权与创新效率呈现负向关系,而非国有产权与创新效率呈正向关系。 This paper estimates the innovation efficiency of the Strategic Emerging Industries in China by using the SFA model, then the panel Tobit model is used to analyze the impacting path of industrial innovation efficiency under the enterprise scale and different innovation modes, and the influencing degree on the innovation efficiency according to different ownership structures. The research findings are as follows: the innovation efficiency levels are generally lower in China's Strategic Emerging Industries; there is an inverted U relationship between the enterprise scale and innovation efficiency ; the independent innovation and the introduction of technology have a relatively significant positive influence on innovation efficiency, while the influence of technology transformation and absorption is not significant. This paper also finds that it appears different innovation efficiency under the influence of different ownership structures. There is a negative relationship between the state-owned property and the innovation efficiency, while the non state-owned property has a positive influence on innovation efficiency.
作者 肖兴志 谢理
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期26-35,共10页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"中国战略性新兴产业发展理论与政策研究"(10JJD790013) 辽宁省财政科研基金项目"支持辽宁战略性新兴产业发展财政政策研究"(10B001)
关键词 战略性新兴产业 企业规模 创新方式 创新效率 SFA模型 strategic emerging industries enterprise scale innovation way innovation efficiency SFA model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bond. Dynamic Panel Data Models : A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice [ J ]. Portuguese Economic Journal, 2002, (1) :141 -162.
  • 2Coelli,T. J. A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4. 1 : A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation [ R ]. CEPA Working Papers, 1996 : 7 - 96.
  • 3Howe, J. D and Mcfetridge, D. G.. The Determinants of RD Expenditures[ J ]. Canadian Journal of, 1976, 9, (1) :57 -71.
  • 4Jefferson, G. Z. Hu,X. Yu,X. Guan. Ownership, Performance, and Innovation in China's Large-and Medium-size Industrial Enterprise Secter[ J]. Journal Of Comparative Economics ,2003,14, ( 1 ) :89 - 113.
  • 5Loeb,P. D. and Lin, V. Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry:A Specification Error Approach [ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1977,26, ( 1 ) :45 -51.
  • 6Shrieves R. Market Structure and Innovation : A New Perspective [ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1978,26, (4) : 329 - 347.
  • 7Soete, L. L. G. Firm Size and Innovation Activity[ J]. European Economic Review,1979, (12) :319 - 340.
  • 8聂辉华,谭松涛,王宇锋.创新、企业规模和市场竞争:基于中国企业层面的面板数据分析[J].世界经济,2008,31(7):57-66. 被引量:470
  • 9吴延兵.创新的决定因素--基于中国制造业的实证研究[J].世界经济文汇,2008(2):46-58. 被引量:65
  • 10吴延兵.自主研发、技术引进与生产率——基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2008,43(8):51-64. 被引量:455

二级参考文献169

共引文献1436

同被引文献1233

引证文献77

二级引证文献1024

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部