期刊文献+

复方苦参注射液联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 被引量:6

Fufang Kushen Zhusheye with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Curing of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨复方苦参注射液联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效及其影响。方法:80例晚期NSCLC患者随机分为GP组(吉西他滨加顺铂)和GKP组(吉西他滨加顺铂加复方苦参注射液)。化疗后对患者的疗效及不良反应进行评价。结果:治疗后GP组总有效率为32.5%,GKP组为57.5%(P<0.05)。GP组1年和2年生存率分别为30.0%和18.0%,GKP组35.0%和20.0%。主要的毒性是3级或4级骨髓抑制,治疗后白细胞、中性粒细胞和血小板的减少率2组之间有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:在疗效方面GKP组优于GP组,同时GKP方案的不良反应减少率较GP方案更显著,因此GKP方案值得临床推广使用。 Objective:To explore the curative effect and other influences of Fufang Kushen Zhusheye combined regimens containing gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods:A total of 80 advanced NSCLC patients were divided randomly into two groups:GP group [(gemcitabine,G) plus(cisplatin,P)] and GKP group [(GP) plus(Fufang Kushen Zhusheye,K)].The efficacies and side effects were analyzed and compared after chemotherapy.Results: After treatment,the overall response rate was 32.5% in GP group and 57.5% in GKP group(P0.05).The 1-and 2-year survival rates were 30.0.% and 18.0% in GP group,and 35.0% and 20.0% in GKP group.The major toxicity was grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression,the reducing rates of leucopenia,neutropenia and thrombocytopenia had significantly difference(P0.05) in both groups after treatment.Conclusions: The GKP group was superior to GP group in curative efficacy,but side effects were more remarkably reduction in the GKP regimen than in GP regimens,therefore,and the GKP regimen is worth of recommendation to clinical use.
出处 《中国临床医学》 2011年第4期489-491,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 复方苦参注射液 顺铂 吉西他滨 Non-small cells lung cancer Fufang kushen zhusheye Cisplatin Gemcitabine
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Schiller JH, Harrington D. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2): 92-8.
  • 2Zhou Y, Gwadry FG, Reinhold WC, et al. Transcriptional regulation of mitotic genes by camptothecin-induced DNA damage: microarray analysis of dose- and time- dependen effects [ J ]. Cancer Res, 2002, 62(6): 1688-95.
  • 3Jagasia MH, Langer CJ, Johson DH, et al. Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter phase II study[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7(1): 68-73.
  • 4Ikuno N, Soda H, Watanabe M, et al. Lrinotecan (CPT-11) and characteristic mucosal changes in the mouse ileum and cecum [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1995, 87(24): 1 876-83.
  • 5DeVore RF, Johnson DH, Crawford J, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(9): 2710-20.
  • 6Moil K, Machida S, Yoshida T, et al. A phase II study of irinotecan and infusional cispiatin with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J ]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1999, 43(6): 467-70.
  • 7Saito H, Kudoh S, Nakagawa K, et al. Phase II study of 3-week scheduling of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer [J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2006, 29(5): 503-7.
  • 8Ohe Y, Ohashi Y, Kubota K, et al. Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, eisplatin plus gcmcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Ann Cooperative Study in Japan [J]. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18(2): 317-23.
  • 9孙燕,周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:106-107

共引文献8

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部