期刊文献+

Straumann种植体早期负荷与延迟负荷稳定性的比较研究 被引量:7

Comparison of stability of Straumann implants under early loading and delayed loading
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的通过RFA仪器监测,了解Straumann种植体在植入颌骨后骨愈合期间早期负荷与延迟负荷其稳定性的变化并分析其规律。方法选择25例牙列缺损患者,共植入Straumann种植体52枚。患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组在术后第6周进行早期负荷,对照组在术后第12周进行延迟负荷。用RFA仪器分别测量各种植体在种植术当日、术后1周、4周、6周、8周、12周时代表稳定性的ISQ值。将两组ISQ值根据不同时间段进行比较分析并进行统计学检验。结果所有种植体在植入时都取得了良好的初期稳定性,ISQ平均值为64.39±0.66。各组种植体稳定性在术后第4周下降至最低,而从第4周到第6周出现明显上升。统计学分析表明实验组和对照组的种植体的ISQ值在不同时间段间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论早期负荷的种植体在不同骨愈合时期能取得良好的稳定性。在合理的计划和选择病人后,实施早期负荷不失为一个好的治疗手段。 Objective To compare the implants′ stability under early loading(6 weeks' healing) with that under delayed loading(12 weeks' healing) to provide objective data for choosing the timing of implant restoration in clinics using resonance frequency analysis(RFA).Methods 52 Straumann implants were placed into 25 partially or totally edentulous patients.The patients were divided into 2 groups randomly.The test group was loaded at the 6th week after surgery.The control group was loaded at 12th week after surgery.ISQ was tested by RFA on the day of surgery and consecutively at the 1st,2nd,4th,6th,8th,10th and 12th week.Results All the 52 implants achieved good primary stability in surgery.The mean ISQ value was 64.39±0.66 on the day of surgery and dropped to the lowest point at the 4th week after surgery,then got notable increase between 4th and 6th weeks after surgery in the stability curve.There was no statistics difference of mean ISQ value and its changing pattern between different loading time.Conclusions The present study indicated that the healing with early loading of Straumann implant at the 6th week could be predictable.The early loading could be applied in properly planned and well-selected cases.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2011年第8期476-479,共4页 Stomatology
关键词 种植体 早期负荷 延迟负荷 implant early loading delayed loading
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial [ J ]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004,15(2) : 142-149.
  • 2Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S,et al. The anchorage of Branemark and ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003,14(5) : 593 -600.
  • 3Roccuzzo M, Wilson T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks'loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla: one year results [ J ]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13 ( 5 ) : 502 - 507.
  • 4Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, et al. Branemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials [ J ]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2000,2(2) : 61 -69.
  • 5Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible [ J ]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2001,3(1) : 2 -8.
  • 6Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Cho IH, et al. The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts. A histologic and biomechanic study in the rabbit[ J ]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,28 ( 3 ) : 224 - 231.
  • 7Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, et al. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage[ J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2004, 68(2) : 149 - 159.

同被引文献106

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部