摘要
选取BRC食品标准第五版和IFS食品标准第五版,从其认可集团名录以及标准的结构等两方面进行剖析。分析结果表明:BRC标准在英国和美国有着广泛的支持,而德国、法国以及意大利的采购商则更加支持IFS标准,立足于全球的大型超市如乐购、家乐福、沃尔玛和麦德龙,对两个标准均持支持的态度;上述两个标准均包含质量管理体系与食品安全管理体系,这其中食品安全管理体系占主导地位。IFS与BRC标准的差异性在于IFS主要考察项目比BRC条款要少13条,BRC条款中要求的医疗筛查、硬塑料、陶瓷并未在IFS条款中涉及到。不同国家对两个标准所展现支持力度的统计,可以对准出口厂家的出口定位起到一定的引导作用;而两标准结构的同异性分析,则起到促使准出口厂家更有针对性地准备审核的作用。
BRC food standard version 5 and IFS food standard version 5 were selected with the purpose of comparison and analyzing from two aspects,i.e.group who recognize the standards and standard structure.The result of analysis indicated that BRC standard was widely recognized in England and The United State of America.In comparison purchasers from Germany,France and Italia more support the IFS standard.The large supermarkets located around global areas such as Tesco,Carrefour,Wal-Mart and Metro presented the attitude of supporting both of the standards.Both of the aforementioned two standards contained quality management system and food safety management system,in which food safety management system was occupying in a led position.The difference between IFS and BRC standards were mainly reflected as the quantity of clauses in IFS standard which was less than the quantity of clauses in BRC standard,the requirements related to medical screening,hard plastic,ceramics were present in BRC standard,but not in IFS standard.The statistic of the supporting powers by different countries to the respective standards could let the factories who were preparing for exporting to their target country knew which standard needed to be certified.The similar aspects and the different aspects obtained from the analysis of the two standards could promote the factories who want to export to prepare for the audit in a more targeted way.
出处
《食品工业科技》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第8期357-360,407,共5页
Science and Technology of Food Industry
