摘要
目的比较解剖型钢板(AP)与锁定钢板(LCP)治疗有移位的跟骨骨折的疗效。方法 2005年1月～2011年2月33例跟骨关节内骨折分别行解剖型钢板(AP)与锁定钢板(LCP)内固定,对其疗效进行回顾性分析,比较两种治疗方法的疗效。结果所有患者均顺利通过手术,32例足术后获得随访6～24个月(平均13个月)。优良率:解剖型钢板(AP)优良率70.0%,锁定钢板(LCP)优良率91.6%。结论解剖型钢板治疗涉及关节面的有移位的骨折优良率较低,并发症多,解剖型锁定板优良率高,并发症少,统计学分析有显著性差异,可以作为首选。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of anatomic plate（AP） and locking compression plate（LCP） in treatment of calcaneal fracture.Methods 33 patients with calcaneal fracture were treated with anatomic plate（AP）and locking compression plate（LCP）.The therapeutic effects were compared in the study.Results All operations were done successfully.Of all,32 patients were followed up for 6-24 months.Excellence rate： AP was 70.0% and LCP was 91.6%.Conclusion AP has significantly lowexcellence rate with more complications when compared with LCP.LCP may be the first point in treatment of calcaneal fracture with high excellence rates with few complications.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2011年第22期10-12,共3页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
跟骨骨折
骨折固定术
Calcaneal fracture
Internal fixation
