期刊文献+

多系统萎缩患者头部磁共振的神经影像学特点 被引量:4

Features of MRI in the patients with multiple system atrophy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨多系统萎缩(MSA)患者在头部磁共振检查(MRI)的神经影像学特点,并与帕金森病(PD)进行比较。方法对13例MSA-C型患者、12例MSA.P型患者和30例PD患者的常规MRI检查进行回顾性形态学测量分析。结果MSA-C组桥脑断面面积及桥脑前后径大小明显低于PD组[桥脑断面面积:MSA-C组为(386.4±74.2)mm^2,PD组为(528.5±40.8)mm^2;桥脑前后径大小:MSA.C组为(17.9±1.8)mm,PD组为(20.24-1.4)mm],2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为6.5、4.7,P均〈0.01),而MSA-P组[桥脑断面面积为(474.1±88.0)mm。,桥脑前后径大小为(19.3±2.4)mm]与PD组差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05);MSA-C组及MSA-P组小脑中脚大小均明显低于PD组,差异均有统计学意义[MSA-C组为(6.1±1.6)mm,MSA-P组为(6.5±1.2)mm,PD组为(9.1±1.0)mm,t值分别为6.2、7.1,P均〈0.01],而MSA-C组与MSA—P组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。MSA.C组MRI形态学表现中敏感性最高的是小脑萎缩,其次是桥脑十字征、小脑中脚高信号,但小脑萎缩特异性不高,桥脑十字征及小脑中脚高信号具有较高的特异性;MSA-P组MRI形态学表现中敏感性相对高一些的是壳核外侧高信号及壳核弥漫性高信号,但其特异性不高。结论MRI检查MSA形态学改变具有较高的诊断价值,并能与PD讲行蓉别诊断. Objective To investigate the features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the brain of patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and compare with that in Parkinson Disease (PD). Methods Thirteen patients with MSA-C, 12 patients with MSA-P, and 30 patients with Pakinson disease (PD) were retrospectively studied in terms of MRI data. Results The area of the pons in the patients with MSA-C (386.4 ± 74.2) mm^2 was significantly smaller than in those with PD ( 528.5 ±40.8) mm^2, as well as the average of the pons transverse diameter ( [ 17.9 ±1.8 ] mm in the patients with MSA-C and [ 20.2 ± 1.4 ] mm in PD patients) ( t =6.5 and 4.7,Ps 〈0.01). The area of the pons in MSA-P patients (474.1±88.0)mm2 and the average of the pons tranverse diameter ( 19.3 + 2.4) mm were similar to those of PD patients ( Ps 〉 0. 05 ). The average width of middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP) in MSA-C (6.1 ± 1.6 ) mm and MSA-P ( 6.5 ± 1.2 ) mm were smaller than those in PD patients ( 9. 1± 1. 0) mm ( t = 6.2 and 7. 1, Ps 〈 0.01 ), whereas there was no significant difference between MSA-C and MSA-P group ( P 〉 0.05 ). Inthe MRI findings, cerebellar atrophy was the highest sensitive, and cruciform hyperintensity and hyperintensity of MCP followed. The MRI profiles were more specific for hyperintensity of cruciform and MCP than for cerebellar atrophy in MSA-C population. For MSA-P population, MRI was relatively sensitive for hyperintensity of rim of the putamen and putamen, but less sPecific. Conclusion The assessment of MRI may be nseful to diagnose and distinguish MSA from PD.
作者 朴英善 冯涛
出处 《中国综合临床》 2011年第7期705-708,共4页 Clinical Medicine of China
关键词 多系统萎缩 帕金森病 磁共振成像 Multiple system atrophy Parkinson disease MRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy [ J]. J Neurol Sci, 1999,163 ( 1 ) :94-98.
  • 2Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson "s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1992,55 (3) :181-184.
  • 3Oba H, Yagishita A, Terada H, et al. New and reliable MR1 diagnosis for progressive supranuclear palsy [ J]. Neurology,2005, 64(12) :2050-2055.
  • 4Nicoletti G, Fera F, Condino F, et al. MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width : differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease [ J ]. Radiology ,2006,239 (3) :825-830.
  • 5Warmuth-Metz M, Naumann M, Csoti I, et al. Measurement of the midbrain diameter on routine magnetic resonance imaging:a simple and accurate method of differentiating between Parkinson disease and progressive supranuclear palsy [J]. Arch Neurol, 2001,58 ( 7 ) : 1076-1079.
  • 6Uchikado H,DelleDonne A, Uitti R, et al. Coexistence of PSP and MSA: a case report and review of the literature [J]. Acta Neuropatho1,2006,111 (2) : 186-192.
  • 7Quattrone A, Nicoletti G, Messina D, et al. MR imaging index for differentiation of progressive supranuclear palsy from Parkinson disease and the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy [J]. Radiology ,2008,246 ( 1 ) :214-221.
  • 8Wenning GK, Tison F, Ben Shlomo Y, et al. Muhiple system atrophy: a review of 203 pathologically proven cases [J]. Mov Disord, 1997,12 ( 2 ) : 133-147.
  • 9Lee EA, Cho HI, Kim SS, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging in subtypes of multiple system atrophy [ J]. Parkinsonism Relat Disord,2004,10 (6) :363-368.
  • 10Horimoto Y, Aiba I, Yasuda T, et al. Longitudinal MRI study of multiple system atrophy - when do the findings appear, and what is the course [ J]. J Neurol,2002,249(7 ) :847-854.

二级参考文献11

  • 1王胜军,迟兆富,吴伟,侯金文,陈雯.多系统萎缩的临床与MRI特征[J].临床神经病学杂志,2006,19(2):86-89. 被引量:15
  • 2鲁晓燕,陈巨坤,王鲁宁,桂秋萍.Shy-Drager综合征与纹状体黑质变性MRI-病理对照研究[J].中华放射学杂志,1997,31(2):111-111. 被引量:16
  • 3Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N, et al. Concensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci, 1999,163:94
  • 4Lee EA, Cho HI, Kirn SS, et al. comparison of magnetic resonance imaging in subtypes of multiple system atrophy. Parkinson and Related Disorders ,2004,6:363
  • 5Schrag A, Kingsley D, Phatouros C, et al. Clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in muhiple system atrophy. Journal of Neurology, 1998,65:65
  • 6Horimoto Y, Aiba I, Yasuda T, et al. Longitudinal MRI study of multiple system atrophy-when do the finding appear, and what is the course? J Neurol,2002,249 : 847
  • 7Savoiardo M, Strada L, Girotti F, et al. Olivopontocerebellar atrophy : MR diagnosis and relationship to multisystem atrophy. Radiology, 1990,174:693
  • 8Watanabe H, Fukatsu H, Hishikawa N, et al. Field strengths and sequences in fluence putaminal MRI findings in multiple system atrophy. Neurology, 2004,64 : 671
  • 9Eduard K, Claudia T, Dorothee PA, et al. T2^* -weighted MRI differentiates multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease. Neurology, 2002,59 : 1265
  • 10Ghaemi M, Hilker R, Rudolf J, et al. Differentiating multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease:contribution of striatal and midbrain MRI volumetry and multi-tracer PET imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2002,73:517

共引文献14

同被引文献35

  • 1吴雪海,朱剑虹.微意识状态的临床特征和脑认知功能研究进展[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2005,31(6):480-480. 被引量:4
  • 2Ng WT, Lee MC, Hung WM,et al. Clinical outcomes and pat-terns of failure after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for naso-pharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011,79(2):420-428.
  • 3Lai SZ,Li WF, Chen L, et al. How does intensity-modulatedradiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapyinfluence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma pa-tients. [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011,80 (3): 661-668.
  • 4Chen L, Liu LZ,Mao YP,et al. Grading of MRI-detected skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its prognostic val-ued], Head Neck, 2011, 33(9):1309-1314.
  • 5Caldemeyer KS,Mathews VP, Righi PD,et al. Imaging fea-tures and clinical significance of perineural spread or extension ofhead and neck tumors[J]. Radio Graphics* 1998,18(1) ;97~110.
  • 6Liang SB, Sun Y,Liu LZ, et al. Extension of local disease in.nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected^ by magnetic resonance ima-ging :improvement of clinical target volume delineation [J], IntJ Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009,75(3):742-750.
  • 7Sham JS, Wei WI,Kwan WH, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic ex-amination and biopsy in determining the extent of nasopharynge-al carcinoma [J]. Cancer, 1989 , 64(9) : 1838-1842.
  • 8苗旺,杨期东,王蕾,刘恒方,罗红波,鲍娟,郭伟新.Wallenberg综合征患者继发意识障碍的原因分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2008,10(3):185-187. 被引量:2
  • 9潘建基.鼻咽癌’92分期修订工作报告[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2009,18(1):2-6. 被引量:264
  • 10冯逢,有慧,王含,郑福玲,金征宇,崔丽英.相位加权成像在多系统萎缩与帕金森病的鉴别诊断中的作用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2009,31(2):129-133. 被引量:7

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部