期刊文献+

胸腰椎骨折SF内固定后脊柱的稳定性研究 被引量:3

Study of Stabisity of Post-operation in the Thiraclumbar Spinal Fracture with SF Instrumentation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:根据各种不同内固定器对脊柱固定节段的稳定性的影响及承载能力的影响,评价内固定器稳定脊柱的效果。方法:利用7 具新鲜尸体胸腰段脊柱标本,在T12 - L1 间造成不稳定模型,在标本的T12、L2 脊柱安装固定器械,用SF器械固定( 试验组),同时采用RF、Dick、Steffee、AO 内固定器械固定( 对照组) 。结果:(1)SF内固定器的刚度、弯曲刚度、扭转刚度均大于RF、Dick、Steffee、AO器械。(2)SF内固定胸腰椎骨折后承载能力强,稳定性好。结论:SF内固定器不仅设计优于传统的RF、Dick、Steffee、AO装置,实验亦证实其更符合脊椎的生物力学特点,有坚强的稳定脊柱的作用。 Objective To evaluate the stability of post -operation through the study of the effect of various instrumentations on the spinal fixative segments. Methods Seven fresh thoracic and lumbar spine specimens were used to create instability experimental group and with RF、Dick、Steffee、AO as the control. Results (1)The axial rigidity, bending rigidity, torision rigidity of SF intermal fixation was superior to the rigidity of RF、Dick、Steffee、AO. (2)The load of SF internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures can attain 6.2Bw which is equal to the normal level.Conclusion Through the biochanical research, we have proved that SFis better than RF、Dick、Steffee、AO, and we think it is a ideal instrumentation available today.
出处 《苏州医学院学报》 1999年第11期1180-1184,共5页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Suzhou
关键词 胸腰椎骨折 SF内固定 生物力学 骨折固定术 thoracolumbar fracture SF instrumentation biochanical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1王以进.以生物力学观点对几种骨折固定法的评价[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1987,2(1):57-57.
  • 2邬蜀成.海绵质骨螺钉拔出试验之生物力学分析[J].医用生物力学,1995,10:167-167.
  • 3董扬,胡清潭.不同内固定固固定后脊柱稳定性的比较研究[J].医用生物力学,1993,8(2):77-81. 被引量:3
  • 4邬蜀成,医用生物力学,1995年,10卷,167页
  • 5董杨,医用生物力学杂志,1993年,8卷,2期,77页
  • 6王以进,骨科生物力学,1989年,99,156,166页
  • 7王以进,骨与关节损伤杂志,1987年,2卷,1期,57页

共引文献2

同被引文献12

  • 1唐天驷,杨惠林.112例椎弓根螺钉位置分析[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(7):411-413. 被引量:32
  • 2本刊编辑部,杨子明,郭昭庆,党耕町.胸腰椎骨折诊断与治疗热点问题高峰论坛纪要[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(8):505-508. 被引量:49
  • 3[2]Frankel H L,Hancock D O,Hyslop G,et al.The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paeaplegia and teteaplegia.Paraplegia,1969, 7: 179-192
  • 4[3]Weinstein JN,Sprett KF,Spengler D,et al.Spinal pedicle fixaton: Reliability and surgical factors on successful screw placement [J].Spine,1988,13:1012-1014
  • 5[5]Zou DW,Yoo JU,Edwards WT. Mechanics of anatomic reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures: Comparison of distraction versus distraction plus lordosis in the anatomic reduction of the thoracolumbar burst fracture[J].Spine,1993,18:195-203
  • 6[7]Ruan Dk,Shen GB,Chui HX.Shen instrumentation for the management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures[J].Spine, 1998, 23: 1324-1331
  • 7Maynard FM,Bracken MB,Creasey G,et al.International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.American Spinal Injury Association[J].spinal Cord,1997,35(5):266-274.
  • 8McCormack T,Karaikovic E,Gaines RW.The load-sharing classification of spine fractures[J].Spine,1994,19(15):1741-1744.
  • 9Mimura M,Panjabi M,Oxland TR,et al.Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexbility of the lumbar spine[J].Spine,1994,19(12):1371-1380.
  • 10洪天禄,徐耀增,孙俊英,唐天驷,董天华.腰椎滑脱症和胸腰椎骨折的内固定器研制及其临床应用[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(8):456-459. 被引量:85

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部