期刊文献+

污泥停留时间对微波-厌氧消化联合处理水解酸化残余污泥的影响研究

EFFECT OF THE SRT ON THE TREATMENT OF THE RESIDUAL SLUDGE AFTER HYDROLYSIS ACIDIFICATION USING THE MICROWAVE IRRADIATION-ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了污泥停留时间(SRT)分别为7、14、28 d时,采用微波-厌氧消化联合处理水解酸化残余污泥的效果。试验同时设置进泥为不经微波处理的水解酸化残余污泥的对照组。结果表明,SRT为14 d时微波组SCOD去除率可达最高值84.91%;微波组和对照组在SRT为7、14、28 d的条件下对SS的去除率差异不明显,SRT由28 d缩短至7 d时SS去除率仅下降了3.95%;SRT为7、14、28 d时,微波组的污泥产甲烷率比对照组的分别高出39.09%、27.48%和26.75%。说明采用该联合工艺处理水解酸化残余污泥在SRT为14 d时即可达到较好的效果,同时微波处理可增加水解酸化污泥的产甲烷活性。 Under the different sludge residence time(SRT=7 d,14 d and 28 d respectively),the removal efficiency of residual sludge after hydrolysis acidification using the microwave(MW) irradiation-anaerobic digestion process was researched.The control group used the untreated residual sludge after hydrolysis acidification under the same condition.The result show that when the SRT is 14 d,the SCOD removal rate of the MW group reaches the maximum of 84.19%;The SS removal rate of the MW group and the control group are very similar under the different SRT of 7 d,14 d and 28 d,the SS removal rate only decreases 3.95% when shorten the SRT from 22 d to 7 d;Under the SRT of 7 d,14 d and 22 d,the methane production rate of the MW group is 39.09%,27.48% and 26.75% higher than the control group respectively.It suggests that the MW irradiation-anaerobic digestion process can achieve the removal effect and improve the methane production rate under the SRT of 14 d when using it to treat the residual sludge after hydrolysis acidification.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期49-51,82,共4页 Technology of Water Treatment
关键词 微波预处理 水解酸化 污泥厌氧消化 污泥减量 microwave pretreatment hydrolysis acidification anaerobic sludge digestion sludge reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献35

  • 1杨波,陈季华,奚旦立,沈佳璐.厌氧水解酸化-好氧氧化A_1/A_2/O工艺剩余污泥减量[J].环境科学,2006,27(3):478-482. 被引量:14
  • 2许传珍,孙春宝,郝二成,周军.5点pH值滴定法测定VFA方法的研究[J].市政技术,2007,25(1):54-56. 被引量:11
  • 3Kampas P, Parsons S A, Pearce P, et al. Mechanical sludge disintegration for the production of carbon source for biological nutrient removal [ J ]. Water Res, 2007,41 (8) :1734 - 1742.
  • 4Llabres P, Pavan P, Battistioni P, et al. The use of organic fraction of municipal solid waste hydrolysis products for biological nutrient removal in wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Res, 1999,33 ( 1 ) :214 - 222.
  • 5Chen Y G,Jiang S, Yuan H Y,et al. Hydrolysis and acidification of waste activated sludge at different pHs [J]. Water Res,2007,41 (3):683 -689.
  • 6Yasui H,Goel R,Li Y Y,et al. Modified ADM1 structure for modelling municipal primary sludge hydrolysis [J]. Water Res,2008,42 ( 1 - 2) :249 - 259.
  • 7Vavilin V A, Rytov S V, Lokshina L Y, et al. Simplified hydrolysis models for the optimal design of two-stage anaerobic digestion [ J ]. Water Res, 2001,35 ( 17 ) : 4247-4251.
  • 8Perot C, Amar D. Optimization of sludge anaerobic digestion by separation hydrolysis-acidification and methanogenesis[ J ]. Environ Technol Lett, 1989,10 (7) :633-644.
  • 9Kargi F, Uygur A. Nutrient removal performance of a sequencing batch reactor as a function of the sludge age [ J ]. Enzyme Microb Technol,2002,31 (6) :842 - 847.
  • 10Hu Z R, Wentzel M C, Ekama G A. Modelling biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems-a review[ J ]. Water Res ,2003,37 ( 14 ) :3430 - 3444.

共引文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部