期刊文献+

反倾销被诉贸易效应的实证分析与比较——基于1998-2008年动态面板数据模型的SYS-GMM估计 被引量:1

Analysis and Compare on Trade Effects of Antidumping Action on Involved Countries:SYS-GMM Estimation Based on Dynamic Panel Data Model during 1998-2008
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在整理全球反倾销案件的基础上,通过收集相关贸易数据,利用1998-2008年被诉反倾销案件为样本建立动态面板数据模型,实证分析了12个主要国家和地区被诉反倾销的贸易破坏效应和贸易转移效应,通过SYS-GMM估计进行回归估计得到稳健性结果。实证结果表明,反倾销措施对贸易额和出口市场份额的影响远大于关税措施的影响,成为多数国家限制进口、保护本国国内产业的主要贸易政策。反倾销对中国、日本、中国台湾和俄罗斯的负面影响较大。最后考察反倾销对产业竞争力的影响发现,反倾销申诉和反倾销措施对申诉方的产业竞争力有显著的提升作用,并且反倾销措施的影响远大于反倾销申诉的影响。 Based on global antidumping cases and relevant trade data,then a dynamic panel data model is established to estimate the trade destructing effect and trade diversion effect of antidumping,using antidumping data during 1998-2008 through SYS-GMM.Empirical studies show that,the influence of antidumping method on trade value and market share are far larger than that of tariff,and antidumping measures becoming the major trade policy to limit import and protect local industries.China,Japan,Chinese Taipei and Russia are among the most influenced countries.At last,by estimating the effect of antidumping on industry competitiveness,it can be concluded that both antidumping initiation and antidumping method have positive effect on improving the industry competitiveness of the appealing country,while the influence on antidumping measures is much larger than initiation.
出处 《产经评论》 2012年第2期122-133,共12页 Industrial Economic Review
基金 广东省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(10ZGXM79005) 刘德学主持
关键词 反倾销 动态面板数据 贸易破坏效应 贸易转移效应 显示性比较优势指数 SYS-GMM antidumping dynamic panel data trade destructing effect trade diversion effect revealed comparative advantage indexes System generalized method of moments
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Davies,S.W..McGuinness A.J..Dumping at Less Than Marginal Cost[J].Journal of International Economics,1982,12:169-182.
  • 2Brander,J.A.,Krugman,P.A..‘Reciprocal Dumping’Model of International Market Share Rivalry[J].Journal of Inter-national Economics,1983,18:83-100.
  • 3Brander,J.A.,Spencer,B.J..Tacit Collusion,Free Entry and Welfare[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1985,3:277-295.
  • 4Staiger,R.W.,Wolak,F.A..The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopolist[J].Journalof International Economics,1992,32:265-287.
  • 5Prusa,T.J..Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?[J].Journal of Internatinal Economics,1992,33:1-20.
  • 6Tharakan P K M.Is Anti-dumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999,2:179-206.
  • 7杨仕辉,王红玲,舒颜颜.反倾销动态博弈与效应分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(11):43-49. 被引量:11
  • 8Messerlin,P.A..The EC Antidumping Regulations:A First Economic Appraisal[J].Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1989,125(3):563-587.
  • 9Krupp,C.M.,Pollard,P.S..Market Responses to Antidumping Laws Some Evidence from the U.S.Chemical Industry[J].The Canadian Journal of Economics,1996,29(1):199-227.
  • 10Prusa,T.J..The Trade Effects of U.S.Anti-dumping Actions[A].in Feenstra,ed.,The Effects of US Trade Protectionand Promotion Policies[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1997:191-213.

二级参考文献92

共引文献258

同被引文献19

  • 1Anderson T.W. and C. Hiao. 1982. Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375): 598-606.
  • 2Arellano, M. and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations [J], Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297.
  • 3Arellano, M. and O. Bover. 1995. Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error components models [J]. Journal of Econometrics ,68(1): 29-52.
  • 4Bown C.P. and M.A. Crowley. 2007. Trade Deflection and Trade Depression [J].Journal of International Economics ,72 (1): 176-201.
  • 5Brenton P. 2001. Antidumping Policies in the EU and Trade Diversion [J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 17 (3):593-607.
  • 6Lasagni A. 2000. Does Country-targeted Antidumping Policy by the EU Create Trade Diversion? [J]. Journal of World Trade, 34(4): 749-762.
  • 7Konings, J., H. Vandenbussche, and L.Springael. 2001. Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy [J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 1(3):283-299.
  • 8Krupp C.M. and S. Skeath. 2002. Evidence on the upstream and downstream impacts of antidumping cases [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(2): 163-178.
  • 9Messedin P. A. 1989. The EC Antidumping Regulations: A First Economic Appraisal, 1980-85 [J]. Review of World Economics, 125(3):563-587.
  • 10Park S. 2009. The trade depressing and trade diversion effects of antidumping actions: The case of China [J]. China Economic Review, 20(3):542-548.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部