摘要
目的观察口底多间隙感染应用负压吸引的疗效及对VAS的影响。方法选择笔者所在医院2005年1月～2010年1月口腔科收治的口底多间隙感染患者52例作为研究对象,根据术后引流情况随机分为两组:负压吸引组(简称A组,n=31),引流管组(简称B组,n=21),比较两组的手术疗效及对VAS的影响。结果两组治疗后未置引流时的SP、DP、HR与术前SP、DP、HR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。引流开始3min时两组SP、DP下降,HR升高,但与治疗前及治疗后未置引流时比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且上述两组间比较差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。引流结束后30minSP、DP、HR分别恢复至治疗前,分别与治疗前及治疗后未置引流时、引流开始3min时比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。引流结束后30min两组间SP、DP、HR比较,差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与B组比较,A组患者的VAS评分低、患者疼痛程度轻、引流时间短、患者治疗后住院时间短、并发症发生率低(P<0.05)。结论口底多间隙感染应用负压吸引疗效好、患者痛苦少,缩短了住院时间,对患者的心率、血压无明显影响,其疗效优于传统引流管,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe the application of the floor of mouth and more space infections suction effect and the impact on the VAS.Methods 52 patients were randomly divided into two groups：vacuum aspiration group and drainage group surgical treatment groups were compared and the impact on the VAS.Results After treatment,drainage is not set when the SP,DP,HR and preoperative SP,MAP,DP,HR,the difference was not significant.And the comparison between the two groups,no significant differences（P 0.05）.And drainage between the two groups 30 minutes after the end of SP,MAP,DP,HR,the difference was not statistically significant（P 0.05）.51 cases of 52 patients were cured.Only 1 patient had complications in hospital and later died.Conclusion The application of the floor of mouth suction multi-space infections is effective,the patient less pain,shorter hospital stay,the patient＇s heart rate,blood pressure had no significant effect,its efficacy is superior to conventional drainage and is worthy of promotion and application.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2011年第9期37-38,40,共3页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
口底多间隙感染
负压吸引
VAS
Floor of the mouth and more space infections
Vacuum aspiration
VAS
