期刊文献+

APACHEIII评分系统在急性肾衰竭肾替代治疗中的应用 被引量:1

Evaluation of APACHEIII score system in acute renal failure patients under sustained low-efficiency dialysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)在急性肾衰竭肾替代治疗中的应用。方法:收集我院2007年2月~2010年10月进行持续低效血液透析法(SLED)治疗的重症急性肾功能衰竭88例,于SLED前24h内计算APACHEⅢ,并估算患者的死亡风险系数。结果:88例患者存活60例,死亡28例,平均年龄(61.1±16.8)岁;死亡组使用SLED主要为少尿、酸碱失衡、电解质紊乱和SIRS,而存活组中以水负荷过重和肌酐升高为主;88例急性肾衰竭患者APACHEⅢ均值为(90.8±28.7)分,风险系数为(0.68±0.31);死亡组均值为(112.3±26.5)分和存活组均值为(75.7±15.9)分,差异有高度统计学意义(t=6.75,P<0.001);APACHEⅢ>50分时,死亡风险为60.2%;>70分时病死率为90.0%;经统计学检验,影响SLED患者预后的危险因素为机械通气(P=0.001)、低血压(P=0.025)和高胆红素血症(P=0.029)。结论:实行SLED的急性肾衰竭死亡者与存活者的APACHEⅢ评分存在显著差异,APACHEⅢ评分可用于评价实施SLED的ARF患者的死亡风险。 Objective: To analyze the clinical application of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE) scoring in acute renal failure(ARF) patients under sustained low-efficiency dialysis(SLED).Methods: We studied 88 ARF patients under SLED in our hospital in the year from February 2007 to October 2010.We calculated the APACHEIII scores before SLED in 24 hours,and estimated their coefficient of mortality risk also.Results: We collected a total of 88 ARF patients under SLED.Their age ranged(61.1±16.8) years,60 patients were suivial,and 28 patients were died.The death groups used SLED for oliguria,acid-base unbalance,electrolyte disturbance and SIRS,while the survival groups for water load and creatinine increase.The average APACHEIII score was(90.8±28.7),and the coefficient of mortality risk was(0.68±0.31).The APACHEIII score in death and survival groups was(112.3±26.5) and(75.7±15.9) respectively(t=6.75,P0.001).The risk of death was 60.2% when the APACHEIII score was 50,and the fatality was 90.0% when the APACHEIII score was 70.It showed that hyperbilirubinemia(P=0.029),mechanical ventilation(P=0.001) and hypotension(P=0.025)were the risk factors affecting the prognosis of SLED patients by statistical tests.Conclusion: The prognosis of SLED patients is closely correlated to.The APACHEⅢ score between the group of died patients and survival patients under SLED was siginificant differences,APACHEⅢ scoring can be applied to predict mortality of ARF patients under SLED.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第16期187-189,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 急性肾衰竭肾 持续低效血液透析法 APACHEⅢ评分系统 ARF SLED APACHEⅢ score system.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Ninah M, Brilli RJ. Coagulation dysfunction in sepsis and multiple organ system failure [J].Crit Care C1in,2003,19(3):441-458.
  • 2周素鲜,马继红,陈欣怡,刘春梓,王亚丽.护理干预内容列入重症病人评估积分的研究与探讨[J].中华护理杂志,2001,36(7):485-488. 被引量:46
  • 3李福强,李晓斌,朱建辉,吴政庚,李小江,杨丽艳.APACHE Ⅱ、APACHE Ⅲ在ICU中应用比较[J].中外医疗,2010,29(20):88-89. 被引量:13
  • 4Vanholder R, Biesen WV, Lameire N. What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients [J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001,l 2:40-43.
  • 5Song SW, Yang HS, Lee S, et al. Earlier application of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support rescues patients from severe cardiopulmonary failure using the APACHE Ⅲ scoring system [J]. J Korean Med Sci,2009,24 (6): 1064-1070.
  • 6Chen YC, Hsu HH, Fang JT. APACHE Ⅲ scoring system in critically Ⅲ patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis [J]. Dial Transplant2002,31 (4):222-233.

二级参考文献10

共引文献57

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部