期刊文献+

检测血清CYFRA21-1、CEA、CA50及NSE对肺癌诊断的价值 被引量:10

The Value of Combined Determination of Serum CYFRA21-1, CEA,CA50 and NSE in the Adjuvant Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 应用放射免疫技术同步检测了21 例肺癌和25 例肺部良性疾病患者的血清 C Y F R A21- 1 、 C E A、 C A50 及 N S E 的水平, 并分析其灵敏度,特异性,准确率,以探索肺癌辅助诊断的新途径。结果显示:肺癌患者的四种标志物血清水平高于肺部良性疾病患者, 有比较显著的差异( P<0 .01) 。肺癌组 C Y F R A21 - 1 水平9 .94 ±10 .36ng/m L,非肿瘤组水平2 .72 ±2 .37ng/m L( P< 0 .01) ,肺癌组阳性率66 .7 % ,非肿瘤组仅为8 % 。对比分析四种标志物以不同方式组合的联合检测对肺癌诊断的灵敏度、特异性、准确率, 表明含有 C Y F R A21 - 1 的三种标志物联合检测对肺癌诊断价值最大, 灵敏度100 % ,特异性80 % ,准确率80 .8 % 。此四种标志物对肺癌辅助诊断有价值,建议临床工作中采用 C Y F R A21 - 1 、 C E A、 N S E 联合检测。 To explor the new means for diagnosis of lung cancer, serum CYFRA21-1,CEA,CA50 and NSE levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay in 21 patients with lung cancer and 25 patients with benign lung diseases, while the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of tumor markers were also analysed respectively. The levels of CYFRA21-1,CEA,CA50 and NSE in patiants with lung cancer were significantly higher than those in group with benign lung diseases ( P <0.01). The average CYFRA21-1 levels in patients with lung cancer and patients with benign lung diseases were 9.94±10.36ng/mL and 2.72±2.37ng/mL( P <0.01) respectively.The positive rates in lung cancer group and benign lung diseases group were 66.7% and 8% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combined determination contanining CYFRA21-1 were 100%,80% and 80.8% respectively, being higher than other in diagnosis for lung cancer. CYFRA21-1,CEA,CA50 and NSE are significant valuble in adjuvant diagnosis of lung cancer. It is suggested that the determination combined CYFRA21-1,CEA and NSE should be used in clinical medicine.
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 1999年第3期167-169,154,共4页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
关键词 CYFRA21-1 CEA CA50 NSE 肺肿瘤 血清诊断 Lung cancer CYFRA21-1 CEA CA50 NSE
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献41

同被引文献47

  • 1赵玉兰,张光彩,朱红.血清CYFRA21-1、NSE、CEA测定对肺癌诊断的临床应用[J].中华临床医药杂志(北京),2004,5(12):87-87. 被引量:1
  • 2邵美娟,曾义锋,倪莉,温怀凯.神经元特异性烯醇化酶测定影响因素的探讨[J].江西医学检验,2004,22(6):531-532. 被引量:10
  • 3赵庆荣.糖链抗原CA19-9 RIA诊断消化道癌临床意义[J].中华核医学杂志,1987,7(2):75-75.
  • 4DeGiorgio CM. Neuron-specific enolase, marker of acute neuronal injury,is increased in complex partial status epilepticus[J]. Epilepsia, 1996,37 (7) : 606-609.
  • 5Rabinowicz AL, Correale JD, Bracht KA, et al. Neuronspecific enolase in increased after nonconvulsive status epileticus[J]. Epilepsia, 1995,36: 457.
  • 6刘举珍,蔡铁铁,秦莎娜.血清NSE、CA242、TPA、CEA联检对肺癌的诊断价值[J].放射免疫学杂志,2007,20(4):371-372. 被引量:1
  • 7Rafael Molina,Jose MA,Xavier Filella,et al.Progastrin-releasing Pepfide (ProGRP) in patients with benign and malignant diseases:comparison with CEA,SCC,CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in patients with lung cancer[J].Anticancer Research,2005,25(3A):1773-1778.
  • 8Marcello Tiseo,Andrea Ardizzoni,Mara AC,et al.Predictive and prognostic significance of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in non-small cell lung cancear[J].Anticancer Research,2008,28(1B):507-513.
  • 9Stieber P,Hasholzner U,Bodenmuller H,et al.CYFRA21-1:a new marker in lung cancer [J].Cancer,1993,72:707-713.
  • 10Shaw E.Utility of serum marker NSE in SCLC [ J].Proc Ann Meeting Am Soc Clin Onccl,1995,A29:14.

引证文献10

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部