摘要
目的 比较3M Attest 1292生物指示荆与3M 1250化学指示卡对压力蒸汽灭菌监测的效果.方法 将2个生物指示剂、2个化学指示卡和1个留点温度计200℃置于标准试验包中心部位,将标准试验包置于134℃脉动真空灭菌器内排气口上方分别作0.5 min、1 min、2 min、3 min、4 min的灭菌后观察结果.结果 生物指示剂在各个时间点的阳性率分别为100%、100%、90%、20%、0%;化学指示卡分别为：100%、90%、10%、0%、0%.结论 3M Attest 1292生物指示剂为压力蒸汽灭菌结果提供了可靠保证的、快速实用的效果监测方法.化学指示剂对灭菌结果监测不够准确但快速.生物指示剂和化学指示剂相辅相成,两者共同使用可以更加准确地监测压力蒸汽灭菌效果.有利于工作的开展.
Objective To compare the monitor effects between the 3M Attest 1292 biological indicator and the 3M 1250 chemical indication cards by autoclave sterilization. Methods Two biological indicators, two chemical indication cards, and one 200 ℃ thermometer were placed in the sterilizer to observe the results after 0. 5 min, 1min, 2 min, 3 min and 4 min sterilization at 134℃ respectively. Results The positive rates of the biological indicators at each time point were 100% , 100% , 90% , 20% ,0% ; those of the chemical indicators were 100%, 90% , 10%, 0%, 0%. Conclusions 3M Attest 1292 biological indicator can provide a more reliable guarantee, fast and practical monitoring methods to the autoclave sterilization. The monitor effect of chemical indicators are not accurate but fast The common use of biological indicators and chemical indication cards can be more accurate for the monitor by autoclave sterilization, and it is conducive to sterilizing work.
出处
《国际护理学杂志》
2011年第5期729-730,共2页
international journal of nursing
关键词
生物指示剂
化学指示卡
压力蒸汽灭菌
Biological indicator
Chemical indicator
Autoclave sterilization
