期刊文献+

关于技术人工物的两重性理论的述评 被引量:9

A Commentary about the Thought of Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术人工物的两重性是指技术人工物具有功能和物理结构双重属性,其探究的是技术功能与物理结构之间的关系,技术功能与设计者、使用者的意向之间的联系;在技术人工物的两重性理论被提出后,它受到了米切姆等学者对其合法性的讨论;技术人工物两重性的划分及其所探讨的设计者与使用者的意向关系,开启了"技术-伦理"实践的征程,这促使荷兰学派基于技术哲学的经验转向,开始探求技术应用伦理这个课题。 The dual nature of technical artifacts means physical structure and technical function as two natures of technical artifacts.The program consists of two research lines,the first will address the relation between technical function and physical structure,the second the relation between technical function and the intentionality of designers and users;When it comes,there are some experts inquiry it's legitimacy,such as Mitcham;The division of the dual nature of technical artifacts and the relation between designer and user can be considered as a beginning of "Technology-Ethics" practice,this situation let the School of Dutch study technology applied ethics in the background of "empirical turn in the philosophy of technology".
作者 刘宝杰
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期51-56,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地(道德哲学与中国道德发展研究所)2009年度重大项目阶段性成果
关键词 技术人工物的两重性 物理结构 技术功能 “技术-伦理”实践 the dual nature of technical artifacts physical structure technical function "technology-ethics" practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1潘恩荣.走向工程设计哲学[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(12):61-67. 被引量:5
  • 2潘恩荣.当代分析的技术哲学之“难问题”研究[J].哲学研究,2010(1):107-112. 被引量:9
  • 3阴训法,陈凡.论“技术人工物”的三重性[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(7):28-31. 被引量:20
  • 4林慧岳,黄柏恒.荷兰技术哲学的经验转向及其当代启示[J].自然辩证法研究,2010,26(7):31-36. 被引量:16
  • 5Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. Reply to Critics[J], Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Tech- nology,2002, 6 (2): 34-43.
  • 6Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts-Presentation of a new Research Pro- gramme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2002, 6 (2), 4-8.
  • 7Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meljers (eds.). Philosophy of Technical Artifacts[M]. Joint Delft-Eindhoven Research Programme 2005-2010.
  • 8Sven Ove Hansson (vip Editor). Understanding Techno logical Function: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Dual Nature Programme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Socie-ty for Philosophy and Technology,2002,6 (2):1-3.
  • 9Carl Mitcham. Do Artifacts have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 2002, 6 (2):9-12.
  • 10Kroes P A and A W M Meijers, eds. Introduction: The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2006, vol. 37, issuel:1-4.

二级参考文献43

  • 1陈昌曙.试谈对“人工自然”的研究[J].哲学研究,1985(1):40-46. 被引量:23
  • 2冯.赖特,陈波.分析哲学:一个批判的历史概述(下)[J].社会科学论坛,1999(Z4):36-40. 被引量:2
  • 3潘恩荣.科学概念的认知进路与转向——科学技术论视野[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):12-16. 被引量:6
  • 4拉普 刘武等(译).技术哲学导论[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1986.2-3.
  • 5Baker, L. R. , 2004, "The ontology of artifacts", in Philosophical Explorations 7 ( 2 ) : pp. 99 - 111.
  • 6Houkes, Wybo, 2006, "Knowledge of artefact functions", in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 ( 1 ) : pp. 102 - 113.
  • 7Houkes, Wybo & Meijers, Anthonie, 2006, "The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem", in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37(1) : pp. 118 -131.
  • 8Kim, Jaegwon, 1994, "Supervenience in philosophy of mind", in S. D. Guttenplan (ed.) , A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, pp. 575 - 583, Oxford : Blackwell.
  • 9Kitcher, P. & Salmon, W. , 1989, Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • 10Kroes, Peter, 1998, "Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technological objects", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 2008 (3) : pp. 18 -34. ( http ://scholar. lib. vt. edu/ejournals/SPT/v3n3/KROES, html).

共引文献42

同被引文献95

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部