期刊文献+

带有受限缩并规则的兰贝克演算中的照应算子 被引量:5

Anaphora Slash in Lambek Calculus with Limited Contraction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 主要以贾戈尔(Jager)在类型逻辑框架下对照应现象的处理方法为依托展开研究。试图厘清几种从范畴角度出发处理照应现象的方法,从中筛选出简明高效的方法,即贾戈尔通过在带有受限缩并规则的兰贝克演算中引入照应算子"|"(anaphora slash)的处理方法。目的是为读者清晰地描绘出逻辑学家与语言学家们研究问题的思路历程,以提醒读者在研究的过程中不要纠缠于他们所提供的艰深知识,而要把研究重心转向对其思想方法的追寻,以期有更多斩获。 This paper bases its research on the work of G.Jger's treatment over anaphoric phenomena under Type Logic frame.The simplest and most efficient method to deal with anaphoric relations is chosen from several categorial approaches to anaphora,namely,the one that G.Jger extends the inventory of category forming connectives by a new kind of implication,anaphora slash,written as "|".The aim of this paper is to describe how the linguists and logicians think and do when they run into a tough issue,and to remind readers to avoid endless quibbling over minor details during study.In order to obtain more achievements in future study,we should concentrate on their basic ways of investigation.
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2011年第4期6-11,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"面向自然语言信息处理的范畴类型逻辑研究"(09BZX046)
关键词 照应关系 范畴 照应算子 代词 anaphoric relation category anaphora slash pronoun
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Gamut L T F. Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar [ M]. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • 2Groenendijk J,Stokholf M. Dynamic Predicate Logic[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1991,14:39 - 100.
  • 3Barker C,Shan C. Donkey Anaphora is In-Scope Binding [ J]. Semantics & Pragmatics ,2008,1 : 1 - 46.
  • 4邹崇理.从语言到逻辑——范畴类型逻辑序列[J].重庆工学院学报,2006,20(4):1-7. 被引量:6
  • 5Gabby D M. Labelled Deductive Systems:Principles and Applications, Vol. 1 : Basic Principles [ M ]. Oxford : Ox- ford University Press, 1996.
  • 6满海霞,李可胜.类型逻辑语法[J].哲学动态,2010(10):103-106. 被引量:2
  • 7Szabolcsi A. Combinatory Grammar and Projection from the Lexicon [ C ]//Sag I, Szabolcsi A. Lexical Matters, CSLI, Standford, 1992.
  • 8Moortgat M. Generalized Quantification and Discontinu- ous Type Constructors [ C ]//Sijtsma W, yon Horck A. Discontinuous Constituency, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996.
  • 9Morrill G. Type-logical Anaphora[ Z]. Report de Recerca KSI -00 -77 -R, Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informatics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya,2000.
  • 10Hepple M. The Grammar and Processing of Order and Dependency: A Categorial Approach [ D ]. PhD thesis, U-niversity of Edinburgh, 1990.

二级参考文献29

  • 1邹崇理.多模态范畴逻辑研究[J].哲学研究,2006(9):115-121. 被引量:12
  • 2Johan van Benthem,《逻辑之门-约翰·范本特姆经典著作卷Ⅱ:逻辑,语言和认知》,刘新文,郭美云等译,科学出版社,2009,第165页.
  • 3Michael Moortgat, " Categorial type logics", Handbook of Logic and Language, eds. van Benthem, Johan and ter Meulen, Alice, Elsevier, MIT Press, 1996, p.96, chapter 2.
  • 4S. Fullop, On the Logic and Learning of Language, Trafford Publishing, 2004, pp. 66 - 67.
  • 5Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, "A Quasi-arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description", Language, 1953 (29), 9- 47.
  • 6L. Joachim, "The Mathematics of Sentence Structure", The American Mathematical Monthly, 1958 (3), pp. 154 - 170.
  • 7Geach, "A Program for Syntax", Synthese. 1970, Volume 22, pp. 3 -17.
  • 8Barbara Partee and Mats Rooth, "Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity", Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, eds. R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze and A. yon Stechow, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1983, pp. 53 -95.
  • 9R. T. Oehrle, E. Bach and D. Wheeler eds, Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, Reidel Pub. Co, 1988.
  • 10Johan van Benthem, "The Semantics of Variety in Categorial Grammar", Report 83 - 129, Simon Fraser University of Utreeht,Burnaby (B. C. ), Canada. (Revised version in W. Buszkowski, W. Mareiszewski and J. van Benthem eds. , Categorial Grammar, Benjamin, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 37-55).

共引文献6

同被引文献78

  • 1蒋严.语用推理与“都”的句法/语义特征[J].现代外语,1998,21(1). 被引量:119
  • 2周国栋,孔芳,朱巧明.指代消解:国内外研究现状及趋势[C] //内容计算的研究与应用前沿--第九届全国计算语言学学术会议论文集.北京:清华大学出版社,2007:264-269.
  • 3Carlson. A united analysis of the English bare plural [ J ]. Linguistics and Philosophy ,1977( 1 ) : 413 -457.
  • 4Link G. The Logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach [ C ]//Bauerle R, et al. Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Stanford : CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 5Chierchia G. Reference to Kinds Across Languages [ J ]. Natural Language Semantics, 1998 (6) : 339 - 405.
  • 6Landman F. Group ( Ⅰ ) & Group ( Ⅱ) [ J ]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1989 (12) : 559 - 605,723 - 744.
  • 7Landman F. Events and Plurality:the Jerusalem Lectures [ M ]. Kluwer Academic Publishers ,2000.
  • 8Link G. Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy [ M ]. Stanford : CSLI Publications. 1998.
  • 9潘海华.焦点、三分结构与汉语“都”的语义解释[c]//语言研究与探索(13).北京:商务印书馆,2006.
  • 10Fox C. The Ontology of Language : Properties,Individuals and Discourse[ M ]. Stanford: CSLI Publications,2000.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部